ReviewDer Radiologe2021
[Classification of pancreatitis].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expression levels ofAnnals of surgical treatment and research · 2023Article
- [Imaging diagnostics of chronic pancreatitis].Der Internist · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth, acute and chronic pancreatitis represent complex disease patterns, whose effective treatment is based on structured diagnostics and therapy by a multi-professional team. There are different systems for an improved objectivity in the classification of the severity of the disease
objectivesOverview of the common classifications of acute and chronic pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND
methodsLiterature research of currently used classifications of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Evaluation of the current chronic pancreatitis guideline.
resultsFor acute pancreatitis, the modified Atlanta Classification and the "determinant-based" classification are most widely used. These classifications are complemented by clinical risk scores such as the Marshall Score and the SOFA Score. In chronic pancreatitis, the image-based Cambridge classification was established. For clinical assessment further classifications such as the ABC classification and the M‑ANNHEIM classification are applied evaluating leading symptoms such as pain, exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33988737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.