Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33988503›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Low-dimensional learned feature spaces quantify individual and group differences in vocal repertoires.

Jack Goffinet, Samuel Brudner, Richard Mooney, John Pearson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dynamic Compression Flows for Neuroscience Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Computational Urban Ecology of New York City Rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Detection of Individual Differences Encoded in Sequential Variations of Elements in Zebra Finch Songs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jack GoffinetDepartment of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6729-0848
Samuel BrudnerDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6043-9328
Richard MooneyDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3308-1367
John PearsonCenter for Cognitive Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9876-7837
Duke University · US

Funding

Mechanisms for internally and externally guided sensorimotor learningR01NS099288 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D · 2016 to 2025
$3.9M
Motor Modulation of Auditory ProcessingR01DC013826 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D · 2015 to 2025
$3.8M
Using Genetic Tools to Dissect Neural Circuits for Social CommunicationR01MH117778 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D, WANG, FAN · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Corticostriatal contributions to motor exploration and reinforcementR01NS118424 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GARDNER, TIMOTHY JAMES, LOIS, CARLOS · 2023 to 2024
$2.3M
Testing a model of cortico-basal ganglia support for juvenile imitative learning in zebra finchesF31HD098772 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BRUDNER, SAMUEL · 2020 to 2021
$74k
NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD098772NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013826NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117778NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099288NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increases in the scale and complexity of behavioral data pose an increasing challenge for data analysis. A common strategy involves replacing entire behaviors with small numbers of handpicked, domain-specific features, but this approach suffers from several crucial limitations. For example, handpicked features may miss important dimensions of variability, and correlations among them complicate statistical testing. Here, by contrast, we apply the variational autoencoder (VAE), an unsupervised learning method, to learn features directly from data and quantify the vocal behavior of two model species: the laboratory mouse and the zebra finch. The VAE converges on a parsimonious representation that outperforms handpicked features on a variety of common analysis tasks, enables the measurement of moment-by-moment vocal variability on the timescale of tens of milliseconds in the zebra finch, provides strong evidence that mouse ultrasonic vocalizations do not cluster as is commonly believed, and captures the similarity of tutor and pupil birdsong with qualitatively higher fidelity than previous approaches. In all, we demonstrate the utility of modern unsupervised learning approaches to the quantification of complex and high-dimensional vocal behavior.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedVocalization, AnimalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalData AnalysisLearningMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred DBASongbirdsUltrasonicsautoencodercomputational biologymouseneurosciencestatisticssystems biologyzebra finch

Identifiers

PMID33988503
PMCPMC8213406
OpenAlexW3162317862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.