ArticleThe world journal of men's health2022
Efficacy and Safety of Penile Girth Enhancement Using Hyaluronic Acid Filler and the Clinical Impact on Ejaculation: A Multi-Center, Patient/Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized Active-Controlled Trial.
Article in The world journal of men's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subcutaneous penile silicone sleeve implants for penile augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Managing residual volumes in penile girth enhancement with hyaluronic acid fillers: a case series and literature review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Complications of penile augmentation: A narrative review of injectables, implants, and surgical grafts.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Enhancing scientific discourse on penile girth augmentation: A critical appraisal of Chen et al.'s review.Current urology · 2026Article
- Penile Volume Augmentation With Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Ultrasound Observation.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Penile enhancement: A comprehensive and current perspective.Current urology · 2025Review
- Which Dermal Filler is Better for Penile Augmentation for Aesthetic Purposes? A Prospective, Single-Surgeon Study Based on Real-World Experience.The world journal of men's health · 2025Article
- Unveiling consumer interest and regional disparities: comparative analysis of online search trends for penile aesthetic procedures.Sexual medicine · 2025Article
- Dynamic compliance penis enlargement patch.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
- Surgical treatment of premature ejaculation: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2024Review
- The role of surgical therapy in the management of premature ejaculation: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- Efficacy and complications of hyaluronic acid and polylactic acid for penile augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Review
- The Application of Hyaluronic Acid Injections in Functional and Aesthetic Andrology: A Narrative Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Commentary on "Penile augmentation with injectable hyaluronic acid gel: an alternative choice for small penis syndrome".Asian journal of andrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of penile girth enhancement (PGE) using hyaluronic acid (HA) filler with different physical properties from previous studies. Additionally, we evaluated the clinical impact on ejaculation after PGE. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a prospective, patient/evaluator-blinded, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter trial. Patients recruited between December 2017 and March 2018 were randomly assigned to the HA filler or control group (polylactic acid [PLA] filler). Penile girth, satisfaction level, Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), and self-estimated intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) were assessed at baseline and at 24 weeks post-injection.
resultsSixty-four subjects (32 in each group) completed the trial. The mean increase in girth was 22.74±12.60 mm and 20.23±8.73 mm in the HA and control groups, respectively. Satisfaction level regarding penile appearance and sexual life significantly increased in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of increase in penile girth or change in satisfaction level. Both groups showed significant improvements in PEP index scores. Self-estimated IELT also significantly increased in the HA group (from 5.36±3.51 to 7.86±4.73 minutes, p=0.0001) and control group (from 5.23±3.55 to 6.43±4.22 minutes, p=0.021). No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported.
conclusionsPGE with HA and PLA fillers resulted in significant enhancement of girth without serious AEs with no significant differences. Furthermore, PGE using filler improved clinical symptoms related to ejaculation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.