Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987999›Full record

ReviewThe world journal of men's health2022

Standardized Laboratory Procedures, Quality Control and Quality Assurance Are Key Requirements for Accurate Semen Analysis in the Evaluation of Infertile Male.

Ashok Agarwal, Rakesh Sharma, Sajal Gupta, Renata Finelli, Neel Parekh, Manesh Kumar Panner Selvam, Camila Pinho Pompeu, Sarah Madani, Andrea Belo, Mahsa Darbandi and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The world journal of men's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Vaginally-delivered fast-dissolving antibody tablets (FDAT) for on-demand non-hormonal contraception and multi-purpose protection.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Ashok AgarwalAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. agarwaa@ccf.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-1026
Rakesh SharmaAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9664-6978
Sajal GuptaAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6487-9681
Renata FinelliAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-6407
Neel ParekhAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6218-9254
Manesh Kumar Panner SelvamAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9120-2278
Camila Pinho PompeuInstituto Ideia Fértil, Santo André, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7111-9477
Sarah MadaniDepartment of Biology and Physiology of Organisms, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Science and Technnology, Houari Boumedien, Algiers, Algeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-0129
Andrea BeloHuntington Centro de Medicina Reproditiva S/A, Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5472-400X
Mahsa DarbandiFetal Health Research Center. Hope Generation Foundation, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2243-9319
Neha SinghNOVA IVF, Gorakhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7151-0273
Sara DarbandiFetal Health Research Center. Hope Generation Foundation, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6642-4020
Simryn CovarrubiasAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9792-7587
Raha SadeghiAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6311-8706
Mohamed ArafaAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-8857
Ahmad MajzoubAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-6241
Meaghanne CaraballoAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-5938
Alyssa GiroskiAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6245-5268
Kourtney McNultyAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7641-8935
Damayanthi DurairajanayagamDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh Campus, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9049-0215
Ralf HenkelAmerican Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1128-2982

Funding

American Center for Reproductive Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semen analysis is a basic test for evaluating male fertility potential, as it plays an essential role in driving the future management and treatment of infertility in couples. Manual semen analysis includes the evaluation of both macroscopic and microscopic parameters, whereas automated semen analysis is conducted through a computer-aided sperm analysis system and can include additional parameters that are not evaluated by manual analysis. Both quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) are important to ensure reproducible results for semen analysis, and represent fundamental checks and balances of all stages (pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical) of semen analysis. To ensure accuracy and precision, the laboratory technicians' performance should be evaluated biannually. This narrative review aims to describe standardized laboratory procedures for an accurate assessment of semen parameters that incorporate both QC and QA practices.

Indexed as

Quality assuranceQuality controlSemen analysisStandardization

Identifiers

PMID33987999
PMCPMC8761242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.