ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2021
Resilience and associated characteristics in adults with spina bifida.
Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transitional urology: a comprehensive review of the transitional care process.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Hospital experiences and medical traumatic stress in adults with spina bifida.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding intrinsic capacity in the elderly population: A cross-sectional study in Shanghai, China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cognition and emotional distress in middle-aged and older adults with spina bifida myelomeningocele.PloS one · 2024Article
- Psychosocial needs and outcomes of adults with spina bifida: A scoping review, 1974-2023.Health care transitions · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo measure resilience and identify associated demographic and clinical factors in individuals with spina bifida.
methodAn anonymous survey was distributed via Facebook advertising to individuals with congenital urological conditions. Respondents 18 years or older with spina bifida were included in this study. Resilience was measured with the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Mean resilience levels in the study population and a US general population sample were compared with Student's t-test. Multiple linear regression assessed demographic and clinical factors associated with resilience.
resultsThe mean resilience score for participants (n=195; 49 males, 146 females; mean age 40y 2mo [SD 12y 7mo] range 18-74y) was 27.2 (SD 7.5), which differed from a mean of 31.8 (SD 5.4) for a US general population sample (p<0.01). Multiple linear regression demonstrated significant positive associations between resilience and older age (p=0.04), prior urological surgeries (p=0.03), higher household education (p<0.01), and higher physical function (p<0.01).
interpretationResilience in individuals with spina bifida is moderately poor, relative to the general population, and is associated with certain demographic and clinical factors. As a modifiable construct with positive effects on quality of life, psychological well-being, and health-related behaviors, resilience is a promising target for intervention in individuals with spina bifida. What this paper adds Resilience in individuals with spina bifida is moderately poor. Resilience is lower in individuals with spina bifida than the general population. Resilience is associated with age, household education, physical function, and urological surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.