Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987817›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2021

Medium strength visual long-term memories are the most fragile.

Emma Megla, Geoffrey F Woodman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma MeglaDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Wilson Hall, 111 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Geoffrey F WoodmanDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Wilson Hall, 111 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA. geoffrey.f.woodman@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Visual Event-Related Potentials: Comparative ElectrophysiologyR01EY019882 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WOODMAN, GEOFFREY F · 2010 to 2020
$4.0M
Restoring oscillations underlying adaptive control in schizophrenia with direct currentR01MH110378 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PARK, SOHEE, WOODMAN, GEOFFREY F · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01-EY019882NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH110378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What memories do humans forget? One theory proposes that memories stored with moderate activation levels are weakened when faced with competitive stress so that they are particularly prone to be forgotten. However, research suggests that visual long-term memories are stronger than memories of other modalities, and therefore may never fall into this moderate activation zone. Here we tested these competing predictions by showing to-be-remembered pictures while we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) indexing memory activation during encoding. We found that visual memories with medium levels of activation when first encoded were more prone to forgetting than memories with high or low encoding activation levels, but this only occurred if a memory was faced with competition. This study shows that we forget moderately activated memories when they are subjected to competition, regardless of the modality of experience.

Indexed as

MemoryMemory, Long-TermEvoked PotentialsHumansMental RecallEvent-related potentialsForgetting, human memoryVisual memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.