Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987754›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2021

Dyadic concordance and associations of beliefs with intentions to learn carrier results from genomic sequencing.

Chloe O Huelsnitz, Erin Turbitt, Jennifer M Taber, Katie L Lewis, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker, William M P Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chloe O HuelsnitzNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA. chloe.huelsnitz@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-8112-5005
Erin TurbittThe University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Jennifer M TaberKent State University, Kent, USA.
Katie L LewisNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Leslie G BieseckerNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Barbara B BieseckerResearch Triangle Institute, International, Washington, DC, USA.
William M P KleinNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.

Funding

Genomic Ascertainment - Clinical and Behavioral AspectsZIAHG200387 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, LESLIE · 2013 to 2025
$15.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG200359 09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although romantic couple concordance has been demonstrated across a wide array of health behaviors, little research has examined dyadic concordance in health beliefs. This study examined the extent to which cohabitating romantic dyads' attitudes and beliefs coincide (i.e., dyadic concordance) in addition to how well they predict intentions to learn genomic sequencing results. The actor-partner interdependence model was applied to cross-sectional data from 81 dyads in an exome sequencing study who were surveyed about their risk perceptions, worry, information avoidance, attitudes, and intentions toward learning carrier results. Information avoidance tendencies were positively correlated between partners, but there was low concordance on other beliefs. Individuals' attitudes and information avoidance predicted their own intentions to learn results. Additionally, partners' information avoidance tendencies predicted their partner's intentions to learn results. Future research should explore mechanisms through which one's partner's information avoidance may affect one's own intentions and behaviors.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorIntentionCross-Sectional StudiesGenomicsHumansSexual PartnersSurveys and QuestionnairesActor-partner interdependence modelCarrier resultsDyadic effectsGenomic sequencingHealth beliefs

Identifiers

PMID33987754
PMCPMC8585812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.