Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987735›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Comparative radiological outcomes and complications of sacral-2-alar iliac screw versus iliac screw for sacropelvic fixation.

Ziwei Gao, Xun Sun, Chao Chen, Zhaowei Teng, Baoshan Xu, Xinlong Ma, Zheng Wang, Qiang Yang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. S2AI and iliac screw prominence and removal for symptomatic prominence: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Spinopelvic fixation failure in the adult spinal deformity population: systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Trends in Lumbosacral-Pelvic Fixation Strategies.International journal of spine surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Free-hand insertion of S2AI screw: what can we learn from O-arm navigation?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  12. [Comparative study on implantation safety and stability of SZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Optimal insertion positions of anterior-posterior orientation sacroiliac screw.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ziwei Gao *Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, 406 Jiefang South Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Xun Sun *Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, 406 Jiefang South Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Chao ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, 406 Jiefang South Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Zhaowei TengThe People's Hospital of Yuxi City, Yuxi, China.
Baoshan XuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, 406 Jiefang South Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Xinlong MaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, 406 Jiefang South Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Zheng WangDepartment of Orthopedics, No.1 Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China. wangzheng301@163.com.
Qiang YangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, 406 Jiefang South Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China. yangqiang1980@126.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9294-1083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the outcomes of sacropelvic fixation (SPF) using sacral-2-alar iliac (S2AI) screw with SPF using iliac screw (IS).

methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus was performed for comparative studies between S2AI and IS for SPF. Two independent investigators selected qualified studies and extracted data indispensably. With 95% confidence intervals (CI), the odds ratio (OR) was applied to dichotomous outcomes and standardized mean difference (SMD) was applied to continuous outcomes for each item.

resultsWe included data from thirteen studies involving 722 patients (S2AI, 357 patients; IS, 365 patients). In the pediatric population, the S2AI group had a smaller pelvic obliquity (PO) than the IS group at final follow-up (SMD, - 0.38; 95% CI, - 0.72 to - 0.04). Patients who underwent S2AI screws showed reduced rates of re-operation (S2AI, 13%; IS, 28%), implant failure (S2AI, 12%; IS, 26%) [screw loosening (S2AI, 8%; IS, 20%); screw breakage (S2AI, 2%; IS, 12%)], implant prominence (S2AI, 2%; IS, 14%), pseudarthrosis (S2AI, 3%; IS, 15%), wound infection (S2AI, 8%; IS, 22%) and less blood loss (S2AI, 2035.4 ml; IS, 2708.4 ml).

conclusionRadiological outcomes indicate an effective maintenance of the correction and arrest of progression of deformity by S2AI, which is equal or better than IS. SPF with S2AI screw has obviously lower incidence of postoperative complications and less blood loss. Given these advantages, the S2AI screw seems to be a beneficial alternative to IS.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionBone ScrewsChildHumansIliumSacrococcygeal RegionSacrumComplicationsIliac screwRadiological outcomesS2-alar-iliac screwSpinopelvic fixation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.