ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021
Contributions of the Monkey Inferior Temporal Areas TE and TEO to Visual Categorization.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced neural plasticity in monkey TE compared to TEO during learning of a feature-ambiguous visual categorization task.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Editorial: Neural correlates of visual learning and object representation in inferior temporal lobe.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neural Correlates of Category Learning in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Insights from the Evolving Model of Two Cortical Visual Pathways.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Review
- Object color knowledge representation occurs in the macaque brain despite the absence of a developed language system.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Differences in category information processing between areas TEO and TE of the macaque.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Object recognition in primates: what can early visual areas contribute?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Neuronal mechanism of innate rapid processing of threating animacy cue in primates: insights from the neuronal responses to snake images.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Dissociation between area TE and rhinal cortex in accuracy vs. speed of visual categorization in rhesus monkeys.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Visual recognition in rhesus monkeys requires area TE but not TEO.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to categorize images is thought to depend on neural processing within the ventral visual stream. Recently, we reported that after removal of architectonic area TE, the terminal region of the ventral stream, monkeys were still able to categorize images as cats or dogs moderately well. Here, we investigate the contribution of TEO, the architectonically defined region located one step earlier than area TE in the ventral stream. Bilateral removal of TEO caused only a mild impairment in categorization. However, combined TE + TEO removal was followed by a severe, long-lasting impairment in categorization. All of the monkeys tested, including those with combined TE + TEO removals, had normal low-level visual functions, such as visual acuity. These results support the conclusion that categorization based on visual similarity is processed in parallel in TE and TEO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.