Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987604›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2021

Application of the modified handmade cloning technique to pigs.

Eun Ji Lee, Kuk Bin Ji, Ji Hye Lee, Hyun Ju Oh, Tae Young Kil, Min Kyu Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eun Ji LeeDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-695X
Kuk Bin JiDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3144-9746
Ji Hye LeeDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-5632
Hyun Ju OhMK Biotech, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-8857
Tae Young KilDepartment of Social Welfare, Joongbu University, Geumsan 32713, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4143-449X
Min Kyu KimDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9259-8219
Chungnam National University · KRJoongbu University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is frequently employed to produce cloned animals in laboratories, this technique is expensive and inefficient. Therefore, the handmade cloning (HMC) technique has been suggested to simplify and advance the cloning process, however, HMC wastes many oocytes and leads to mitochondrial heteroplasmy. To solve these problems, we propose a modified handmade cloning (mHMC) technique that uses simple laboratory equipment, i.e., a Pasteur pipette and an alcohol lamp, applying it to porcine embryo cloning. To validate the application of mHMC to pig cloning, embryos produced through SCNT and mHMC are compared using multiple methods, such as enucleation efficiency, oxidative stress, embryo developmental competence, and gene expression. The results show no significant differences between techniques except in the enucleation efficiency. The 8-cell and 16-cell embryo developmental competence and Oct4 expression levels exhibit significant differences. However, the blastocyst rate is not significantly different between mHMC and SCNT. This study verifies that cloned embryos derived from the two techniques exhibit similar generation and developmental competence. Thus, we suggest that mHMC could replace SCNT for simpler and cheaper porcine cloning.

Indexed as

In vitro cultureModified handmade cloningPorcine embryoSomatic cell nuclear transfer

Identifiers

PMID33987604
PMCPMC8071742
OpenAlexW3126966387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.