Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987581›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2021

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) for pH value in the meat of Berkshire pigs.

Jun Park, Sang-Min Lee, Ja-Yeon Park, Chong-Sam Na

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The current status of Korean native pig production.Journal of animal science and technology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun ParkDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-5177
Sang-Min LeeDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8549-879X
Ja-Yeon ParkDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7013-4683
Chong-Sam NaDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8979-5633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to estimate the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effect for pH values affecting Berkshire meat quality. A total of 39,603 SNPs from 1,978 heads after quality control and 882 pH values were used estimate SNP effect by single step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) method. The average physical distance between adjacent SNP pairs was 61.7kbp and the number and proportion of SNPs whose minor allele frequency was below 10% were 9,573 and 24.2%, respectively. The average of observed heterozygosity and polymorphic information content was 0.32 ± 0.16 and 0.26 ± 0.11, respectively and the estimate for average linkage disequilibrium was 0.40. The heritability of pH45m and pH24h were 0.10 and 0.15 respectively. SNPs with an absolute value more than 4 standard deviations from the mean were selected as threshold markers, among the selected SNPs, protein-coding genes of pH45m and pH24h were detected in 6 and 4 SNPs, respectively. The distribution of coding genes <RFX8, CREG2, TBC1D8, EXOC6B> were detected at pH45m and <C12orf49, LOC106506010, BICC1, ANK3> were detected at pH24h.

Indexed as

BerkshireGenome-wide assocition studyHeritabilityLinkage disequilibriumpH value

Identifiers

PMID33987581
PMCPMC7882839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.