Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987568›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2020

Effects of feather processing methods on quantity of extracted corticosterone in broiler chickens.

Mohammad Ataallahi, Jalil Ghassemi Nejad, Jun-Ik Song, Jin-Soo Kim, Kyu-Hyun Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad AtaallahiCollege of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0234-8863
Jalil Ghassemi NejadTeam of an Educational Program for Specialists in Global Animal Science, Brain Korea 21 Plus Project, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6578-8829
Jun-Ik SongDivision of Animal Husbandry, Yonam College, Cheonan 31005, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-8662
Jin-Soo KimCollege of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9518-7917
Kyu-Hyun ParkCollege of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6390-5478
Kangwon National University · KRCheonan Yonam College · KRKonkuk University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corticosterone is known as a biological stress index in many species including birds. Feather corticosterone concentration (FCC) has increasingly been used as a measure for chronic stress status in broiler chickens. As sample preparation is the first step of analytical process, different techniques of feather matrix disruption need to be validated for obtaining better result in analysing corticosterone extraction. The current study was a validation of pulverizing the feather by bead beater (BB) and surgical scissors (SS) processing prior to corticosterone extraction in feather of broiler chickens. The type of feather processing prior to the hormone extraction may alter the final output. Thereby, finding a standard method according to laboratory facilities is pivotal. This study carried out to determine the effects of feather pulverization methods on the extraction amount of corticosterone in broiler chickens. Feathers were sampled from four weeks old Ross 308 broiler chickens (n = 12 birds). All broiler chickens were kept under the same environmental condition and had access to feed and water. Feather samples were assigned to one of the following processing methods 1) using a BB for pulverizing and 2) using a SS for chopping into tiny pieces. Each sample was duplicated into two wells during enzyme immunoassay (EIA) analysis to improve the accuracy of the obtained data. The results showed lower standard errors and constant output of FCC by using the BB method compared with the SS method. Overall comparison of FCC showed a significantly higher (

Indexed as

Bead beaterBroiler chickenEIAFeather corticosterone methodologySurgical scissors

Identifiers

PMID33987568
PMCPMC7721574
OpenAlexW3113295350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.