Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987504›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2020

Identifying cases of chronic pain using health administrative data: A validation study.

Heather E Foley, John C Knight, Michelle Ploughman, Shabnam Asghari, Rick Audas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Chronic noncancer pain management: Integration of a nurse-led program in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather E FoleyDivision of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8839-5497
John C KnightDivision of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Michelle PloughmanPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4594-0077
Shabnam AsghariDiscipline of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-0978
Rick AudasDivision of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8227-1098
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost prevalence estimates of chronic pain are derived from surveys and vary widely, both globally (2%-54%) and in Canada (6.5%-44%). Health administrative data are increasingly used for chronic disease surveillance, but their validity as a source to ascertain chronic pain cases is understudied.

aimThe aim of this study was to derive and validate an algorithm to identify cases of chronic pain as a single chronic disease using provincial health administrative data.

methodsA reference standard was developed and applied to the electronic medical records data of a Newfoundland and Labrador general population sample participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network. Chronic pain algorithms were created from the administrative data of patient populations with chronic pain, and their classification performance was compared to that of the reference standard via statistical tests of selection accuracy.

resultsThe most performant algorithm for chronic pain case ascertainment from the Medical Care Plan Fee-for-Service Physicians Claims File was one anesthesiology encounter ever recording a chronic pain clinic procedure code OR five physician encounter dates recording any pain-related diagnostic code in 5 years with more than 183 days separating at least two encounters. The algorithm demonstrated 0.703 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.685-0.722) sensitivity, 0.668 (95% CI, 0.657-0.678) specificity, and 0.408 (95% CI, 0.393-0.423) positive predictive value. The chronic pain algorithm selected 37.6% of a Newfoundland and Labrador provincial cohort.

conclusionsA health administrative data algorithm was derived and validated to identify chronic pain cases and estimate disease burden in residents attending fee-for-service physician encounters in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Indexed as

algorithmcase ascertainmentchronic painelectronic medical records datahealth administrative datapopulation-basedvalidation

Identifiers

PMID33987504
PMCPMC7967902
OpenAlexW3089892634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.