ReviewCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2020
The Canadian Pain Society: A historical perspective.
Review in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The intersectional implications of a quantitative epistemology in pain care and research.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reviews the major features and events that have characterized the 40-year history of the Canadian Pain Society/Société canadienne de la douleur, which is a chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). The review first describes its early formative years in the 1970s as eastern and western chapters of IASP and then its evolution as a Canada-wide chapter and society. Also highlighted is the formulation in this period of its purpose to foster pain research, education, and management and the many activities in which the Society has been engaged to reinforce this purpose over the ensuing decades. These include its annual scientific meetings and the establishment of publications, guidelines, and other educational material as well as awards to support research and trainees. Many of these activities have included engagement with key partners who have also collaborated with the Society in national and international advocacy for pain. The review also outlines some of the features and factors underpinning the Society's national and international reputation and impact resulting from the many contributions that its members have made to the advances in pain research, education, and management over the past 40 years. The review concludes by noting that by way of its rich history and its past and present experiences, the Society is well positioned to continue its many activities and contributions to address the many challenges still facing the pain field in Canada and around the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.