Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987482›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2021

ULTRAHIGH FIELD and ULTRAHIGH RESOLUTION fMRI.

Kamil Uğurbil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. High Spatiotemporal Resolution Radial Encoding Single-Vessel fMRI.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kamil UğurbilCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, 2021 6 Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55456.

Funding

TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger, KAMIL UGURBIL · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
Elementary Neuronal Ensembles to Whole Brain Networks: Ultrahigh Resolution Imaging of Function and Connectivity in Humans - SUPPLEMENTU01EB025144 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2017 to 2022
$9.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027061NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB025144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become one of the most powerful tools for investigating the human brain. Ultrahigh magnetic field (UHF) of 7 Tesla has played a critical role in enabling higher resolution and more accurate (relative to the neuronal activity) functional maps. However, even with these gains, the fMRI approach is challenged relative to the spatial scale over which brain function is organized. Therefore, going forward, significant advances in fMRI are still needed. Such advances will predominantly come from magnetic fields significantly higher than 7 Tesla, which is the most commonly used UHF platform today, and additional technologies that will include developments in pulse sequences, image reconstruction, noise suppression, and image analysis in order to further enhance and augment the gains than can be realized by going to higher magnetic fields.

Indexed as

Brain ImagingColumn fMRIDenoisingfunctional mappingLayer fMRINeuroimagingOrientation columnsUltrahigh field

Identifiers

PMID33987482
PMCPMC8112570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.