ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2021
Robot-assisted laminectomy in spinal surgery: a systematic review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in robotic-assisted laminectomy in spine surgery: a narrative review.Asian spine journal · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted spinal surgery: technological maturity, clinical evidence, and future directions.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Review
- Accuracy of robot-assisted dental implant surgery and its clinical influencing factors: a retrospective case series of 100 patients.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Critical Anatomy-Preserving & Terrain-Augmenting Navigation (CAPTAiN): Application to Laminectomy Surgical Education.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2025Article
- A Framework of State Estimation on Laminar Grinding Based on the CT Image-Force Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted vs. conventional free-hand technique in spine surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Review of Enhanced Handheld Surgical Drills.Critical reviews in biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- Robotic-Assisted Decompression, Decortication, and Instrumentation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.JBJS essential surgical techniquesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to summarize the current progress in the field of robot-assisted laminectomy in spinal surgery. A systematic search of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, PubMed, Embase, Web of science, The Cochrane Library, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (CBM-SinoMed) was performed for papers related to robotic-assisted laminectomy. A total of 27 articles were selected for inclusion in our study. Among the articles, 10 robotic system, 2 bone cutting strategies, 6 state recognition strategies were founded. The most commonly adopted type of robot system was the Nathoo A type (6/10). Bone cutting strategies were mainly formulated based on force information and medical image information, and state recognition was based on a variety of factors, including force, sound, vibration, medical images, current or a combination of parameters. Early research on robot-assisted laminectomy did not reflect good continuity, and the studies mainly focused on the type of robotic system. In recent years, more researchers have chosen the Nathoo A as the robot system type, and the focus of research has gradually shifted to laminectomy path planning and safety control strategies, such as state recognition. Although these studies have been able to perform laminectomy without penetrating the inner cortex of the lamina, most experiments have been performed in vitro, and clinical application is still untested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.