ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Automatic classification of heterogeneous slit-illumination images using an ensemble of cost-sensitive convolutional neural networks.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Image-Based Deep Learning for Cataract Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- HM_ADET: a hybrid model for automatic detection of eyelid tumors based on photographic images.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLens opacity seriously affects the visual development of infants. Slit-illumination images play an irreplaceable role in lens opacity detection; however, these images exhibited varied phenotypes with severe heterogeneity and complexity, particularly among pediatric cataracts. Therefore, it is urgently needed to explore an effective computer-aided method to automatically diagnose heterogeneous lens opacity and to provide appropriate treatment recommendations in a timely manner.
methodsWe integrated three different deep learning networks and a cost-sensitive method into an ensemble learning architecture, and then proposed an effective model called CCNN-Ensemble [ensemble of cost-sensitive convolutional neural networks (CNNs)] for automatic lens opacity detection. A total of 470 slit-illumination images of pediatric cataracts were used for training and comparison between the CCNN-Ensemble model and conventional methods. Finally, we used two external datasets (132 independent test images and 79 Internet-based images) to further evaluate the model's generalizability and effectiveness.
resultsExperimental results and comparative analyses demonstrated that the proposed method was superior to conventional approaches and provided clinically meaningful performance in terms of three grading indices of lens opacity: area (specificity and sensitivity; 92.00% and 92.31%), density (93.85% and 91.43%) and opacity location (95.25% and 89.29%). Furthermore, the comparable performance on the independent testing dataset and the internet-based images verified the effectiveness and generalizability of the model. Finally, we developed and implemented a website-based automatic diagnosis software for pediatric cataract grading diagnosis in ophthalmology clinics.
conclusionsThe CCNN-Ensemble method demonstrates higher specificity and sensitivity than conventional methods on multi-source datasets. This study provides a practical strategy for heterogeneous lens opacity diagnosis and has the potential to be applied to the analysis of other medical images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.