Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987223›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

A prognostic nomogram for women with primary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma.

Xijuan Wang, Xiurong Ke, Junxia Min

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xijuan WangCancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiurong KeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Rui'an, China.
Junxia MinDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang University · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma (POSRCC) is a rare subtype of ovarian carcinoma that is characterized by abundant mucin accumulation. POSRCC is aggressive, and the prognostic factors associated with its clinical outcome remain poorly defined. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics and survival of patients with POSRCC, and to establish an effective prognostic nomogram and risk stratification model to predict the risks associated with patient outcomes.

methodsData of patients with POSRCC from the period 1975 to 2016 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariable and multivariable analyses of demographic factors, clinicopathological characteristics, and treatments were conducted to identify significant prognostic parameters. The identified independent variables were integrated to develop a nomogram and risk stratification model. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were assessed with the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and calibration curves.

resultsA total of 172 patients were identified as being eligible to participate in this study. The median overall survival (OS) time was 7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.6-9.4 months]. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 35.5%, 15.3%, and 6%, respectively. A multivariable analysis of the primary patients identified the independent predictors for survival as age at diagnosis, race, marital status, T (primary tumor size) stage, and chemotherapy, which were all incorporated into the nomogram. The C-index was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.66-0.75), which was statistically higher than that of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (0.58; 95% CI, 0.53-0.63). ROC curve analysis also showed that the nomogram had good discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74, 0.62, and 0.71 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, respectively. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the prediction by the nomogram and actual observations. A risk stratification model was further used to classify patients into a low-risk or high-risk group. The median OS time for the low- and high-risk groups was 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.33-16.67) and 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.12-2.89), respectively. Surgery did not significantly prolong survival in either group [low-risk group: hazard ratio (HR), 0.69; 95% CI, 0.45-1.07; P=0.09; high-risk group: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.46-0.67; P=0.18].

conclusionsThe proposed nomogram and risk stratification model showed accurate prognostic prediction for POSRCC. These methods could improve individualized evaluations of survival and therapeutic decisions for patients with POSRCC.

Indexed as

Chemotherapynomogramovarian cancerSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER database)survival

Identifiers

PMID33987223
PMCPMC8105814
OpenAlexW3138868577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.