ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
A prognostic nomogram for women with primary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary Ovarian Poorly Differentiated Adenocarcinoma with Signet-Ring Cells: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Epidemiologic characteristics and a prognostic nomogram for patients with vulvar cancer: results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program in the United States, 1975 to 2016.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
- A prognostic model of patients with ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma: a population-based analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma (POSRCC) is a rare subtype of ovarian carcinoma that is characterized by abundant mucin accumulation. POSRCC is aggressive, and the prognostic factors associated with its clinical outcome remain poorly defined. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics and survival of patients with POSRCC, and to establish an effective prognostic nomogram and risk stratification model to predict the risks associated with patient outcomes.
methodsData of patients with POSRCC from the period 1975 to 2016 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariable and multivariable analyses of demographic factors, clinicopathological characteristics, and treatments were conducted to identify significant prognostic parameters. The identified independent variables were integrated to develop a nomogram and risk stratification model. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were assessed with the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and calibration curves.
resultsA total of 172 patients were identified as being eligible to participate in this study. The median overall survival (OS) time was 7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.6-9.4 months]. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 35.5%, 15.3%, and 6%, respectively. A multivariable analysis of the primary patients identified the independent predictors for survival as age at diagnosis, race, marital status, T (primary tumor size) stage, and chemotherapy, which were all incorporated into the nomogram. The C-index was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.66-0.75), which was statistically higher than that of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (0.58; 95% CI, 0.53-0.63). ROC curve analysis also showed that the nomogram had good discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74, 0.62, and 0.71 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, respectively. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the prediction by the nomogram and actual observations. A risk stratification model was further used to classify patients into a low-risk or high-risk group. The median OS time for the low- and high-risk groups was 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.33-16.67) and 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.12-2.89), respectively. Surgery did not significantly prolong survival in either group [low-risk group: hazard ratio (HR), 0.69; 95% CI, 0.45-1.07; P=0.09; high-risk group: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.46-0.67; P=0.18].
conclusionsThe proposed nomogram and risk stratification model showed accurate prognostic prediction for POSRCC. These methods could improve individualized evaluations of survival and therapeutic decisions for patients with POSRCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.