Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33987107›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2021

Amylases: Biofilm Inducer or Biofilm Inhibitor?

Dibyajit Lahiri, Moupriya Nag, Ritwik Banerjee, Dipro Mukherjee, Sayantani Garai, Tanmay Sarkar, Ankita Dey, Hassan I Sheikh, Sushil Kumar Pathak, Hisham Atan Edinur and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Effects of common disinfectants on biofilm formation and eradication inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Role of Virus on Oral Biofilm: Inducer or Eradicator?Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Dibyajit LahiriDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata, India.
Moupriya NagDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata, India.
Ritwik BanerjeeDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata, India.
Dipro MukherjeeDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata, India.
Sayantani GaraiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata, India.
Tanmay SarkarDepartment of Food Technology and Bio-Chemical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.
Ankita DeyDepartment of Biotechnology, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Haringhata, India.
Hassan I SheikhFaculty of Fisheries and Food Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia.
Sushil Kumar PathakDepartment of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Khallikote University, Berhampur, India.
Hisham Atan EdinurSchool of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Siddhartha PatiCentre of Excellence, Khallikote University, Berhampur, India.
Rina Rani RayDepartment of Biotechnology, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Haringhata, India.
University of Engineering & Management · INBerhampur University · INMaulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies · INGovernment of West Bengal · INUniversiti Malaysia Terengganu · MYUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm is a syntrophic association of sessile groups of microbial cells that adhere to biotic and abiotic surfaces with the help of pili and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). EPSs also prevent penetration of antimicrobials/antibiotics into the sessile groups of cells. Hence, methods and agents to avoid or remove biofilms are urgently needed. Enzymes play important roles in the removal of biofilm in natural environments and may be promising agents for this purpose. As the major component of the EPS is polysaccharide, amylase has inhibited EPS by preventing the adherence of the microbial cells, thus making amylase a suitable antimicrobial agent. On the other hand, salivary amylase binds to amylase-binding protein of plaque-forming

Indexed as

AmylasesBiofilmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFimbriae, BacterialStreptococcusAmylasesAnti-Bacterial Agentsamylaseantibiofilmantimicrobialbiofilmsessile

Identifiers

PMID33987107
PMCPMC8112260
OpenAlexW3158424923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.