Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33986992›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Prediction of DNA binding proteins using local features and long-term dependencies with primary sequences based on deep learning.

Guobin Li, Xiuquan Du, Xinlu Li, Le Zou, Guanhong Zhang, Zhize Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ProkDBP: Toward more precise identification of prokaryotic DNA binding proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transcription factor-based biosensors for screening and dynamic regulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Research on DNA-Binding Protein Identification Method Based on LSTM-CNN Feature Fusion.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guobin LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Hefei University, Hefei, China.
Xiuquan DuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Xinlu LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Hefei University, Hefei, China.
Le ZouSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Hefei University, Hefei, China.
Guanhong ZhangSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Hefei University, Hefei, China.
Zhize WuSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Hefei University, Hefei, China.
Hefei University · CNAnhui University · CN

Funding

NINDS Biomarker RepositoryU24NS095871 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI TATIANA M. FOROUD · 2015 to 2026
$18.3M
NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS095871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-binding proteins (DBPs) play pivotal roles in many biological functions such as alternative splicing, RNA editing, and methylation. Many traditional machine learning (ML) methods and deep learning (DL) methods have been proposed to predict DBPs. However, these methods either rely on manual feature extraction or fail to capture long-term dependencies in the DNA sequence. In this paper, we propose a method, called PDBP-Fusion, to identify DBPs based on the fusion of local features and long-term dependencies only from primary sequences. We utilize convolutional neural network (CNN) to learn local features and use bi-directional long-short term memory network (Bi-LSTM) to capture critical long-term dependencies in context. Besides, we perform feature extraction, model training, and model prediction simultaneously. The PDBP-Fusion approach can predict DBPs with 86.45% sensitivity, 79.13% specificity, 82.81% accuracy, and 0.661 MCC on the PDB14189 benchmark dataset. The MCC of our proposed methods has been increased by at least 9.1% compared to other advanced prediction models. Moreover, the PDBP-Fusion also gets superior performance and model robustness on the PDB2272 independent dataset. It demonstrates that the PDBP-Fusion can be used to predict DBPs from sequences accurately and effectively; the online server is at http://119.45.144.26:8080/PDBP-Fusion/.

Indexed as

Convolution neural network (CNN)Deep learningDNA binding protein predictionFusion approachLong short-term memory network (LSTM)Long-term dependence

Identifiers

PMID33986992
PMCPMC8101451
OpenAlexW3157397027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.