Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33986881›Full record

ReviewPrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2021

Complications associated with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy - a review.

Paulina Woźniewska, Inna Diemieszczyk, Hady Razak Hady

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Use of Lower Staple Heights in Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy: National Trends and Impact on Outcomes.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulina Woźniewska1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Inna Diemieszczyk1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Hady Razak Hady1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
University Clinical Hospital In Bialystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an essential bariatric procedure performed in obese patients, which provides significant weight loss and has a positive impact on obesity-related diseases. However, as with any surgical procedure, it carries the risk of complications. The complications that can arise in patients following LSG are divided into acute (diagnosed within 30 days after the surgery) and late. Early complications that require rapid management include haemorrhage (intraluminal or extraluminal), leak in the staple line, and abscess formation. Late complications include gastric stenosis, nutrient deficiencies, mediastinal pouch migration, and the development or exacerbation of gastroesophageal reflux diseases. In this review, we present the basic information about most common complications following LSG, and their symptoms, diagnostic tools, and management.

Indexed as

bariatric surgerylaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID33986881
PMCPMC8112272
OpenAlexW3140881040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.