Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33986752›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021

Microphysiological Systems for Studying Cellular Crosstalk During the Neutrophil Response to Infection.

Isaac M Richardson, Christopher J Calo, Laurel E Hind

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Leveraging Microphysiological Systems to Facilitate Neutrophil-Based Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Tissue Models forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isaac M RichardsonDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado - Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.
Christopher J CaloDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado - Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.
Laurel E HindDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado - Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN HEMATOLOGYT32HL007899 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Jane Ellen Churpek · 1998 to 2026
$8.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophils are the primary responders to infection, rapidly migrating to sites of inflammation and clearing pathogens through a variety of antimicrobial functions. This response is controlled by a complex network of signals produced by vascular cells, tissue resident cells, other immune cells, and the pathogen itself. Despite significant efforts to understand how these signals are integrated into the neutrophil response, we still do not have a complete picture of the mechanisms regulating this process. This is in part due to the inherent disadvantages of the most-used experimental systems:

Indexed as

AnimalsAspergillosisAspergillus fumigatusCell CommunicationHumansImmunity, InnateInflammationNeutrophilsPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas Infectionsantimicrobial functionscell-cell interactionsinfectioninflammationinnate immunityin vitro modelsmicrofluidicsneutrophil

Identifiers

PMID33986752
PMCPMC8111168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.