ArticleFrontiers in neurology2021
Gray Matter Sampling Differences Between Subdural Electrodes and Stereoelectroencephalography Electrodes.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probabilistic comparison of gray and white matter coverage between depth and surface intracranial electrodes in epilepsy.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Seminars in epileptology: Presurgical epilepsy evaluation.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025Review
- A spatial perturbation framework to validate implantation of the epileptogenic zone.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Neuropsychological outcomes after epilepsy surgery: A comparison of stereo electroencephalography and subdural electrodes.European journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Comparing electrical stimulation functional mapping with subdural electrodes and stereoelectroencephalography.Epilepsia · 2023Article
- Efficient volume-based localization and automatic labeling of intracranial depth electrodes.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.