ArticleNature nanotechnology2021
New guidance brings clarity to environmental hazard and behaviour testing of nanomaterials.
Article in Nature nanotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Derivation of Particle Number Concentration from the Size Distribution: Theory and Applications.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- U. S. federal perspective on critical research issues in nanoEHS.Environmental science. Nano · 2023Article
- Potential Artifacts and Control Experiments in Toxicity Tests of Nanoplastic and Microplastic Particles.Environmental science & technology · 2022Review
- Solving Familiar Problems: Leveraging Environmental Testing Methods for Nanomaterials to Evaluate Microplastics and Nanoplastics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Too advanced for assessment? Advanced materials, nanomedicine and the environment.Environmental sciences Europe · 2022Review
- Salivary Leucocytes as In Vitro Model to Evaluate Nanoparticle-Induced DNA Damage.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
33986532What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.