Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33986520›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2021

Tracking developmental differences in real-world social attention across adolescence, young adulthood and older adulthood.

Martina De Lillo, Rebecca Foley, Matthew C Fysh, Aimée Stimson, Elisabeth E F Bradford, Camilla Woodrow-Hill, Heather J Ferguson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Social working memory in adolescence.Child development · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Working memory for gaze benefits from the face context.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Looking at faces in the wild.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martina De LilloSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5659-1522
Rebecca FoleySchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0667-8018
Matthew C FyshSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Aimée StimsonSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8024-8596
Elisabeth E F BradfordSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-0891
Camilla Woodrow-HillDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5274-6304
Heather J FergusonSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. h.ferguson@kent.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1575-4820
University of Kent · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

European Research Council 636458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting and responding appropriately to social information in one's environment is a vital part of everyday social interactions. Here, we report two preregistered experiments that examine how social attention develops across the lifespan, comparing adolescents (10-19 years old), young (20-40 years old) and older (60-80 years old) adults. In two real-world tasks, participants were immersed in different social interaction situations-a face-to-face conversation and navigating an environment-and their attention to social and non-social content was recorded using eye-tracking glasses. The results revealed that, compared with young adults, adolescents and older adults attended less to social information (that is, the face) during face-to-face conversation, and to people when navigating the real world. Thus, we provide evidence that real-world social attention undergoes age-related change, and these developmental differences might be a key mechanism that influences theory of mind among adolescents and older adults, with potential implications for predicting successful social interactions in daily life.

Indexed as

Social InteractionSocial SkillsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAttentionEye Movement MeasurementsFixation, OcularHuman DevelopmentHumansResearch DesignSocial BehaviorTheory of Mind

Identifiers

PMID33986520
PMCPMC7611872
OpenAlexW3130447437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.