Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33986493›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2022

The influence of coffee consumption on bioelectrical impedance parameters: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial.

João F Mota, Maria Cristina Gonzalez, Henry Lukaski, Gabriela L Oto, Claire F Trottier, Jenneffer R B Tibaes, Carla M Prado

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Phase angle and cellular health: inflammation and oxidative damage.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  4. Association of the Bioimpedance Phase Angle and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

João F MotaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada. joao_mota@ufg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6123-7616
Maria Cristina GonzalezPostgraduate Program in Health and Behavior, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, 96055-800, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-8182
Henry LukaskiDepartment of Kinesiology and Public Health Education, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA.
Gabriela L OtoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Claire F TrottierDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Jenneffer R B TibaesDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4032-2560
Carla M PradoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada. carla.prado@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-5641
University of Alberta · CAUniversidade Católica de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of North Dakota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used method for estimating body composition. Avoiding foods/beverages containing caffeine is a frequently enforced pre-test protocol to ensure reliability of BIA measurements. However, few studies have evaluated whether this is necessary, with conflicting results. We aimed to determine whether the coffee consumption differing in caffeine content influences BIA parameters in healthy adults.

methodsTwenty-five healthy adults were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind cross-over trial. Three amounts of caffeine were given with 200 mL of coffee: 0 mg (11 g of decaffeinated), 200 mg (5.5 g of caffeinated plus 5.5 g of decaffeinated), and 400 mg of caffeine (11 g of caffeinated). BIA measurements were conducted at 6 different times, and coefficient variations (CV) explored.

resultsNo differences were observed for group × time interaction on impedance, resistance, or reactance (p > 0.05). Values of BIA parameters increased after 30-min of coffee consumption, independently of the caffeine dosage (all p < 0.001). Body fat percentage followed the same pattern and increased after 45-min (p < 0.05). Median CV for consecutive impedance, resistance, and reactance measurements were >95%CI of expected device measurement error over 70-min, without difference between groups. Urine output volume was not different between groups (decaffeinated: 440.45 ± 197.57 mL; 200 mg: 471.80 ± 171.88 mL; 400 mg: 489.30 ± 204.10 mL, p > 0.05).

conclusionCoffee consumption influenced BIA-derived results after 70-min but was not related to caffeine content, likely due to water intake.

Indexed as

CaffeineCoffeeAdultCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodElectric ImpedanceHumansReproducibility of ResultsCaffeineCoffee

Identifiers

PMID33986493
OpenAlexW3161074409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.