Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33986462›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect.

Karen E Beenken, Mara J Campbell, Aura M Ramirez, Karrar Alghazali, Christopher M Walker, Bailey Jackson, Christopher Griffin, William King, Shawn E Bourdo, Rebecca Rifkin and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. ZnInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Existing and Novel Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen E Beenken *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Mara J Campbell *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Aura M Ramirez *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Karrar Alghazali *Center for Integrative Nanotechnology Sciences, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Christopher M WalkerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Bailey JacksonCenter for Integrative Nanotechnology Sciences, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Christopher GriffinCenter for Integrative Nanotechnology Sciences, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, USA.
William KingCenter for Integrative Nanotechnology Sciences, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Shawn E BourdoCenter for Integrative Nanotechnology Sciences, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Rebecca RifkinDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Silke HechtDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Daniel G MeekerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
David E AndersonDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Alexandru S BirisCenter for Integrative Nanotechnology Sciences, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, USA. asbiris@ualr.edu.
Mark S SmeltzerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. smeltzermarks@uams.edu.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported the development of an osteogenic bone filler scaffold consisting of degradable polyurethane, hydroxyapatite, and decellularized bovine bone particles. The current study was aimed at evaluating the use of this scaffold as a means of local antibiotic delivery to prevent infection in a bone defect contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. We evaluated two scaffold formulations with the same component ratios but differing overall porosity and surface area. Studies with vancomycin, daptomycin, and gentamicin confirmed that antibiotic uptake was concentration dependent and that increased porosity correlated with increased uptake and prolonged antibiotic release. We also demonstrate that vancomycin can be passively loaded into either formulation in sufficient concentration to prevent infection in a rabbit model of a contaminated segmental bone defect. Moreover, even in those few cases in which complete eradication was not achieved, the number of viable bacteria in the bone was significantly reduced by treatment and there was no radiographic evidence of osteomyelitis. Radiographs and microcomputed tomography (µCT) analysis from the in vivo studies also suggested that the addition of vancomycin did not have any significant effect on the scaffold itself. These results demonstrate the potential utility of our bone regeneration scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent infection in contaminated bone defects.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone and BonesBone RegenerationDisease Models, AnimalDrug Delivery SystemsDurapatiteGentamicinsOsteogenesisOsteomyelitisRabbitsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusTissue ScaffoldsVancomycinX-Ray MicrotomographyAnti-Bacterial AgentsDurapatiteGentamicinsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID33986462
PMCPMC8119729
OpenAlexW3163434690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.