ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2021
Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia secondary to spinal cord injury: an autopsy case.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal cord injury (SCI) is a major direct cause of accidental death. Cervical SCI can lead to death in a short time period by neurogenic shock. Prompt vasopressor administration is recommended for patients with SCI accompanied by hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg). We herein present the first fatal case of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) secondary to cervical SCI in a patient who suddenly died 1 week after an accidental fall. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old man without medical history of cardiovascular disease suffered tetraplegia with a neurological level at C4 after a fall accident. He was fully conscious with stable respiratory ability, and the systolic blood pressure was maintained at >90 mmHg without vasopressor agents. High fever occurred 7 days after the accident and he died in the next morning. Autopsy revealed segmental intestinal necrosis from the ileum to the ascending colon, without mesenteric embolism, or severe arteriosclerosis. DISCUSSION: This case implies that maintenance of >90-mmHg systolic blood pressure can insufficiently keep the blood flow to prevent NOMI, and the mean arterial blood pressure of >85 mmHg can be more plausible as suggested in the guideline. Monitoring the mean arterial blood pressure in acute SCI is useful not only for neurological recovery but also for the maintenance of vital intestinal perfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.