Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33986045›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Barriers and facilitators to reporting deaths following Ebola surveillance in Sierra Leone: implications for sustainable mortality surveillance based on an exploratory qualitative assessment.

Mohamed F Jalloh, John Kinsman, James Conteh, Reinhard Kaiser, Amara Jambai, Anna Mia Ekström, Rebecca E Bunnell, Helena Nordenstedt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohamed F JallohDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden mohamed.jalloh@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-7206-8042
John KinsmanDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
James ContehIndependent Consultant, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Reinhard KaiserSierra Leone Country Office, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Amara JambaiSierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Anna Mia EkströmDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rebecca E BunnellDivision of Global Health Protection, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Helena NordenstedtDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9226-6441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand the barriers contributing to the more than threefold decline in the number of deaths (of all causes) reported to a national toll free telephone line (1-1-7) after the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak ended in Sierra Leone and explore opportunities for improving routine death reporting as part of a nationwide mortality surveillance system.

designAn exploratory qualitative assessment comprising 32 in-depth interviews (16 in Kenema district and 16 in Western Area). All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis to identify themes.

settingParticipants were selected from urban and rural communities in two districts that experienced varying levels of Ebola cases during the outbreak. All interviews were conducted in August 2017 in the post-Ebola-outbreak context in Sierra Leone when the Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation was continuing to mandate reporting of all deaths.

participantsFamily members of deceased persons whose deaths were not reported to the 1-1-7 system.

resultsDeath reporting barriers were driven by the lack of awareness to report all deaths, lack of services linked to reporting, negative experiences from the Ebola outbreak including prohibition of traditional burial rituals, perception that inevitable deaths do not need to be reported and situations where prompt burials may be needed. Facilitators of future willingness to report deaths were largely influenced by the perceived communicability and severity of the disease, unexplained circumstances of the death that need investigation and the potential to leverage existing death notification practices through local leaders.

conclusionsSocial mobilisation and risk communication efforts are needed to help the public understand the importance and benefits of sustained and ongoing death reporting after an Ebola outbreak. Localised practices for informal death notification through community leaders could be integrated into the formal reporting system to capture community-based deaths that may otherwise be missed.

Indexed as

Hemorrhagic Fever, EbolaDisease OutbreaksHumansRural PopulationSierra LeoneTelephoneepidemiologypublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33986045
PMCPMC8126305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.