Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33986030›Full record

Trial reportThe European respiratory journal2021

Eliapixant (BAY 1817080), a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in refractory chronic cough: a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover phase 2a study.

Alyn Morice, Jaclyn A Smith, Lorcan McGarvey, Surinder S Birring, Sean M Parker, Alice Turner, Thomas Hummel, Isabella Gashaw, Lueder Fels, Stefan Klein and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The European respiratory journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cough monitoring systems in adults with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Randomised trial of the P2XThe European respiratory journal · 2022
    Trial
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Alyn MoriceRespiratory Research Group, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK a.h.morice@hull.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6135-9610
Jaclyn A SmithManchester University NHS Foundation Trust and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8837-4928
Lorcan McGarveyWellcome Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Surinder S BirringCentre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Sean M ParkerNorth Tyneside Hospital, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
Alice TurnerInstitute of Applied Health Research and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Thomas HummelSmell and Taste Clinic, Dept of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9713-0183
Isabella GashawBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Lueder FelsBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan KleinBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Klaus FranckeBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Christian FriedrichBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Bayer (Germany) · DEKing's College Hospital · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBTechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundATP acting

methodsIn period A, patients received placebo for 2 weeks then eliapixant 10 mg for 1 week. In period B, patients received eliapixant 50, 200 and 750 mg twice daily for 1 week per dose level. Patients were randomised 1:1 to period A-B (n=20) or B-A (n=20). The primary efficacy end-point was change in cough frequency assessed over 24 h. The primary safety end-point was frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs).

results37 patients completed randomised therapy. Mean cough frequency fell by 17.4%

conclusionsSelective P2X3 antagonism with eliapixant significantly reduced cough frequency and severity, confirming this as a viable therapeutic pathway for RCC. Taste-related side-effects were lower at therapeutic doses than with the less selective P2X3 antagonist gefapixant. Selective P2X3 antagonism appears to be a novel therapeutic approach for RCC.

Indexed as

CoughPurinergic P2X Receptor AntagonistsAdultChronic DiseaseCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodHumansReceptors, Purinergic P2X3Treatment OutcomePurinergic P2X Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2X3

Identifiers

PMID33986030
PMCPMC8607926
OpenAlexW3155200986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.