Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33986000›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2021

Risk Factors for Accidental Dural Tears in Spinal Surgery.

Zeiad A F Alshameeri, Vinay Jasani

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Incidental durotomy in lumbar decompressive surgery: incidence and risk-factors, and the effect of durotomy on hospital and patient metrics.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors associated with increased length of stay and risk of complications in 336 patients submitted to spine surgery. The role of a validated capture system (SAVES v2) as a first-line tool to properly face the problem.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Minimally invasive fusion surgery for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study between MIDLIF and TLIF.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical management of dural defects: A review.World journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zeiad A F AlshameeriUniversity Hospital of North Midlands, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Vinay JasaniUniversity Hospital of North Midlands, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Royal Stoke University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccidental dural tears (DTs) are familiar complications of spinal surgery. Their reported incidence varies widely, and several risk factors have been proposed in the literature. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate of DTs and assess their associated risk factors.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using specific MeSH and Text terms. Only articles with prospective data reporting the incidence and risk factors were selected and reviewed based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.

resultsTwenty-three studies were included. The reported incidence rate ranged from 0.4% to 15.8%, giving an overall pooled incidence rate of 5.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-7.3). The incidence rate varied in relation to the part of the spine and the type of surgery. Three factors were associated with a high rate of DTs: age (overall mean difference of 3.04, 95% CI 2.49-3.60), revision surgery (overall odds ratio of 2.28, 95% CI 1.84-2.83), and lumbar stenosis (overall odds ratio of 2.03, 95% CI 1.50-2.75). Diabetes was weakly associated with DTs, with an odds ratio of 1.40 (95% CI 1.01-1.93). The overall effects of sex and obesity were not statistically significant.

conclusionAdvancing age, revision surgery, and lumbar stenosis were significantly associated with increased risk of DTs. These factors should be taken into consideration during the consenting process for spinal surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Risk of dural tear during spine surgery.

Indexed as

accidental dural teardurotomyincidental dural tearrisk factorsspinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID33986000
PMCPMC8176817
OpenAlexW3163378763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.