Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33985892›Full record

ReviewResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2021

Human factors and ergonomics methods for pharmacy research and clinical practice.

Richard J Holden, Ephrem Abebe, Alissa L Russ-Jara, Michelle A Chui

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05493072 (Safety, Performance, and User Perceptions of RxConnect When Used to Provide Patient-specific, Indication Based Prescribing Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05493072 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Safety, Performance, and User Perceptions of RxConnect When Used to Provide Patient-specific, Indication Based Prescribing Support

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2022 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsBehaviorArmsRxConnect
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard J HoldenDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Center for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: rjholden@iu.edu.
Ephrem AbebeDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Alissa L Russ-JaraDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Michelle A ChuiSocial & Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Translating Measures of Visual Experience to Children with Autism and Down SyndromeKL2TR002530 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ROBB, SHERI L · 2018 to 2022
$4.8M
Brain Health Patient Safety Learning LaboratoryP30HS024384 · AHRQ · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2015 to 2018
$3.8M
Brain Safe: Consumer Intervention to Reduce Exposure to Drugs Linked to Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG056926 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HOLDEN, RICHARD J · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Improving Over-the-Counter Medication Safety for Older AdultsR18HS024490 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHUI, MICHELLE ANNE · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
AHRQ HHS P30 HS024384AHRQ HHS R18 HS024490NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002530NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman factors and ergonomics (HFE) is a scientific and practical human-centered discipline that studies and improves human performance in sociotechnical systems. HFE in pharmacy promotes the human-centered design of systems to support individuals and teams performing medication-related work.

objectiveTo review select HFE methods well suited to address pharmacy challenges, with examples of their application in pharmacy.

methodsWe define the scope of HFE methods in pharmacy as applications to pharmacy settings, such as inpatient or community pharmacies, as well as medication-related phenomena such as medication safety, adherence, or deprescribing. We identify and present seven categories of HFE methods suited to widespread use for pharmacy research and clinical practice.

resultsCategories of HFE methods applicable to pharmacy include work system analysis; task analysis; workload assessment; medication safety and error analysis; user-centered and participatory design; usability evaluation; and physical ergonomics. HFE methods are used in three broad phases of human-centered design and evaluation: study; design; and evaluation. The most robust applications of HFE methods involve the combination of HFE methods across all three phases. Two cases illustrate such a comprehensive application of HFE: one case of medication package, label, and information design and a second case of human-centered design of a digital decision aid for medication safety.

conclusionsPharmacy, including the places where pharmacy professionals work and the multistep process of medication use across people and settings, can benefit from HFE. This is because pharmacy is a human-centered sociotechnical system with an existing tradition of studying and analyzing the present state, designing solutions to problems, and evaluating those solutions in laboratory or practice settings. We conclude by addressing common concerns about the implementation of HFE methods and urge the adoption of HFE methods in pharmacy.

Indexed as

PharmaciesPharmacy ResearchDelivery of Health CareErgonomicsHumansHuman-centered designHuman factors/ergonomicsMedication safetySociotechnical systemsUsability

Identifiers

PMID33985892
PMCPMC8603214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.