Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33985825›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2021

Microbubble-Enhanced Heating: Exploring the Effect of Microbubble Concentration and Pressure Amplitude on High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatments.

Alicia Clark, Sierra Bonilla, Dingjie Suo, Yeruham Shapira, Michalakis Averkiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Current Research in Drug-Free Cancer Therapies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Delivery of Cavitation Therapy With a Modified Clinical Scanner: In Vitro Evaluation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alicia ClarkDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sierra BonillaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Dingjie SuoDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Yeruham ShapiraInSightec, Haifa, Israel.
Michalakis AverkiouDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. Electronic address: maverk@uw.edu.

Funding

Development of a Numerical Model for Microbubble Enhanced Treatment in HIFU TherapyR44CA213866 · NCI · DYNAFLOW, INC. · PI HSIAO, CHAO-TSUNG · 2018 to 2019
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS R44 CA213866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a non-invasive tool that can be used for targeted thermal ablation treatments. Currently, HIFU is clinically approved for treatment of uterine fibroids, various cancers, and certain brain applications. However, for brain applications such as essential tremors, HIFU can only be used to treat limited areas confined to the center of the brain because of geometrical limitations (shape of the transducer and skull). A major obstacle to advancing this technology is the inability to treat non-central brain locations without causing damage to the skin and/or skull. Previous research has indicated that cavitation-induced bubbles or microbubble contrast agents can be used to enhance HIFU treatments by increasing ablation regions and shortening acoustic exposures at lower acoustic pressures. However, little research has been done to explore the interplay between microbubble concentration and pressure amplitude on HIFU treatments. We developed an in vitro experimental setup to study lesion formation at three different acoustic pressures and three microbubble concentrations. Real-time ultrasound imaging was integrated to monitor initial microbubble concentration and subsequent behavior during the HIFU treatments. Depending on the pressure used for the HIFU treatment, there was an optimal concentration of microbubbles that led to enhanced heating in the focal area. If the concentration of microbubbles was too high, the treatment was detrimentally affected because of non-linear attenuation by the pre-focal microbubbles. Additionally, the real-time ultrasound imaging provided a reliable method to monitor microbubble activity during the HIFU treatments, which is important for translation to in vivo HIFU applications with microbubbles.

Indexed as

HeatingMicrobubblesPressureHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationPhantoms, ImagingAcoustic shadowingBubble-enhanced heatingHigh-intensity focused ultrasoundInertial cavitationUltrasound contrast agents

Identifiers

PMID33985825
PMCPMC8243806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.