Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33985683›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology2021

Impact of Major Residual Lesions on Outcomes After Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease.

Meena Nathan, Jami C Levine, Maria I Van Rompay, Linda M Lambert, Felicia L Trachtenberg, Steven D Colan, Iki Adachi, Brett R Anderson, Emile A Bacha, Aaron Eckhauser and 20 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interventions for adult congenital heart disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Meena NathanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: meena.nathan@cardio.chboston.org.
Jami C LevineDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Maria I Van RompayHealthCore, New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA.
Linda M LambertDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Felicia L TrachtenbergHealthCore, New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA.
Steven D ColanDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Iki AdachiDivision of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Brett R AndersonDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Emile A BachaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Aaron EckhauserDivision of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
J William GaynorDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eric M GrahamDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Benjamin GootDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Jeffrey P JacobsDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA; Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Rija JohnDivision of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jonathan R KaltmanDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kirk R KanterDivision of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Carlos M MeryTexas Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Dell Children's Medical Center, University of Texas Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas, USA.
L LuAnn MinichDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Richard OhyeDivision of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
David OvermanDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Children's Minnesota, Mayo Clinic-Children's Minnesota Cardiovascular Collaborative, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Christian PizarroDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Nemours Cardiac Center, Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
Geetha RaghuveerHeart Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Marcus S SchambergerDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Steven M SchwartzDivision of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shanthi L NarasimhanDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Masonic Children's Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Michael D TaylorDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Ke WangHealthCore, New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA.
Jane W NewburgerDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Pediatric Heart Network Investigators

Funding

Pediatric Heart network DCCU10HL068270 · NHLBI · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MILLER, JULIE ELAINE, TRACHTENBERG, FELICIA LYNN · 2011 to 2016
$44.9M
Ventricular Volumes and Varability (VVV)U01HL068270 · NHLBI · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI SLEEPER, LYNN A · 2001 to 2010
$40.3M
MIS-C Program: Data Coordinating Center for the Pediatric Heart Network MIS-C ProgramU24HL135691 · NHLBI · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MILLER, JULIE ELAINE, TRACHTENBERG, FELICIA LYNN · 2017 to 2024
$37.9M
Pediatric Heart Network Clinical Research Centers - Boston Children's HospitalUG1HL135685 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI NEWBURGER, JANE W., TRIEDMAN, JOHN K · 2017 to 2023
$2.7M
Sidenafil Impacts Exercise Performance in Adolescent Survivors of the FontanU10HL109818 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI GAYNOR, JAMES WILLIAM, PARIDON, STEPHEN · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
Randomized Trial of Nonflouroscopic Technologies in Pediatric SVT AblationU10HL109816 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI NEWBURGER, JANE W., TRIEDMAN, JOHN K · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
Baylor/Texas Children's Hospital Pediatric Heart NetworkUG1HL135666 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI HEINLE, JEFFREY STEPHEN, PENNY, DANIEL J · 2017 to 2023
$2.4M
Pediatric Heart Network Prairieland ConsortiumUG1HL135678 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI CNOTA, JAMES, PAYNE, RONALD MARK · 2017 to 2023
$2.4M
Pediatric Heart Network Regents of the University of MichiganUG1HL135665 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GOLDBERG, CAREN S, OHYE, RICHARD G · 2017 to 2023
$2.4M
Pediatric Heart Network - Utah CenterUG1HL135646 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MINICH, L. LUANN, WILLIAMS, RICHARD VINCENT · 2017 to 2023
$2.3M
Pediatric Heart Network Prairieland ConsortiumU10HL109673 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI CNOTA, JAMES, PAYNE, RONALD MARK · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
Pediatric Heart Network University of UtahU10HL109743 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MINICH, L. LUANN, WILLIAMS, RICHARD VINCENT · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL119600NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL133454NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL068270NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL068270NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL109673NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL109741NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL109743NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL109778NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL109781NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL109816NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL109818NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL135691NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL135665NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL135680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany factors affect outcomes after congenital cardiac surgery.

objectivesThe RLS (Residual Lesion Score) study explored the impact of severity of residual lesions on post-operative outcomes across operations of varying complexity.

methodsIn a prospective, multicenter, observational study, 17 sites enrolled 1,149 infants undergoing 5 common operations: tetralogy of Fallot repair (n = 250), complete atrioventricular septal defect repair (n = 249), arterial switch operation (n = 251), coarctation or interrupted arch with ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair (n = 150), and Norwood operation (n = 249). The RLS was assigned based on post-operative echocardiography and clinical events: RLS 1 (trivial or no residual lesions), RLS 2 (minor residual lesions), or RLS 3 (reintervention for or major residual lesions before discharge). The primary outcome was days alive and out of hospital within 30 post-operative days (60 for Norwood). Secondary outcomes assessed post-operative course, including major medical events and days in hospital.

resultsRLS 3 (vs. RLS 1) was an independent risk factor for fewer days alive and out of hospital (p ≤ 0.008) and longer post-operative hospital stay (p ≤ 0.02) for all 5 operations, and for all secondary outcomes after coarctation or interrupted arch with VSD repair and Norwood (p ≤ 0.03). Outcomes for RLS 1 versus 2 did not differ consistently. RLS alone explained 5% (tetralogy of Fallot repair) to 20% (Norwood) of variation in the primary outcome.

conclusionsAdjusting for pre-operative factors, residual lesions after congenital cardiac surgery impacted in-hospital outcomes across operative complexity with greatest impact following complex operations. Minor residual lesions had minimal impact. These findings may provide guidance for surgeons when considering short-term risks and benefits of returning to bypass to repair residual lesions.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresEchocardiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMalePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeUnited Statesdays alive and out of the hospitaloutcomesResidual Lesion Score

Identifiers

PMID33985683
PMCPMC8245007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.