Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33985498›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2021

Risk of cardiovascular mortality, stroke and coronary heart mortality associated with aircraft noise around Congonhas airport, São Paulo, Brazil: a small-area study.

Aina Roca-Barceló, Adelaide Nardocci, Breno Souza de Aguiar, Adeylson G Ribeiro, Marcelo Antunes Failla, Anna L Hansell, Maria Regina Cardoso, Frédéric B Piel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aina Roca-BarcelóUK Small Area Health Statistics Unit (SAHSU), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. a.roca-barcelo@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3681-6517
Adelaide NardocciDepartment of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Breno Souza de AguiarEpidemiology and Information Department, Municipal Health Secretariat of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adeylson G RibeiroDepartment of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Antunes FaillaEpidemiology and Information Department, Municipal Health Secretariat of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anna L HansellCentre for Environmental Health and Sustainability, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Maria Regina CardosoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Frédéric B PielUK Small Area Health Statistics Unit (SAHSU), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MRC/S019669/1Medical Research Council MR/P023673/1Medical Research Council MR/P023673/2Medical Research Council MR/S019669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNoise pollution is increasingly recognised as a public health hazard, yet limited evidence is available from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), particularly for specific sources. Here, we investigated the association between day-night average (L

methodsWe selected 3259 census tracts across 16 districts partially or entirely exposed to ≥50 dB aircraft noise levels around the Congonhas airport, using pre-modelled 5 dB L

resultsAfter accounting for all covariates, areas exposed to the highest levels of noise (> 65 dB) showed a relative risk (RR) for CVD and CHD of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.94; 1.20) and 1.11 (95%CI: 0.96; 1.27), respectively, compared to those exposed to reference noise levels (≤50 dB). The RR for stroke ranged between 1.05 (95%CI: 0.95;1.16) and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.78;1.11) for all the noise levels assessed. We found a statistically significant positive trend for CVD and CHD mortality risk with increasing levels of noise (p = 0.043 and p = 0.005, respectively). No significant linear trend was found for stroke. Risk estimates were generally higher after excluding road traffic density, suggesting that road traffic air and noise pollution are potentially important confounders.

conclusionsThis study provides some evidence that aircraft noise is associated with increased risk of CVD and CHD mortality in a middle-income setting. More research is needed to validate these results in other LMIC settings and to further explore the influence of residual confounding and ecological bias. Remarkably, 60% of the study population living near the Congonhas airport (~ 1.5 million) were exposed to aircraft noise levels > 50 dB, well above those recommended by the WHO (45 dB), highlighting the need for public health interventions.

Indexed as

AircraftAirportsBrazilCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleNoise, TransportationRisk FactorsSmall-Area AnalysisStrokeAircraft noiseCardiovascular diseaseMortalityStroke

Identifiers

PMID33985498
PMCPMC8120910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.