Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33985429›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

A novel essential protein identification method based on PPI networks and gene expression data.

Jiancheng Zhong, Chao Tang, Wei Peng, Minzhu Xie, Yusui Sun, Qiang Tang, Qiu Xiao, Jiahong Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of biosciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiancheng ZhongSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410081, China.
Chao TangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410081, China.
Wei PengCollege of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500, Yunnan, China.
Minzhu XieSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410081, China.
Yusui SunSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410081, China.
Qiang TangCollege of Engineering and Design, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410081, China.
Qiu XiaoSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410081, China. xiaoqiu@hunnu.edu.cn.
Jiahong YangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410081, China. jiahong_yang@hunnu.edu.cn.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China 2018JJ2262Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (CN) 19A316the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department 15CY007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome proposed methods for identifying essential proteins have better results by using biological information. Gene expression data is generally used to identify essential proteins. However, gene expression data is prone to fluctuations, which may affect the accuracy of essential protein identification. Therefore, we propose an essential protein identification method based on gene expression and the PPI network data to calculate the similarity of "active" and "inactive" state of gene expression in a cluster of the PPI network. Our experiments show that the method can improve the accuracy in predicting essential proteins.

resultsIn this paper, we propose a new measure named JDC, which is based on the PPI network data and gene expression data. The JDC method offers a dynamic threshold method to binarize gene expression data. After that, it combines the degree centrality and Jaccard similarity index to calculate the JDC score for each protein in the PPI network. We benchmark the JDC method on four organisms respectively, and evaluate our method by using ROC analysis, modular analysis, jackknife analysis, overlapping analysis, top analysis, and accuracy analysis. The results show that the performance of JDC is better than DC, IC, EC, SC, BC, CC, NC, PeC, and WDC. We compare JDC with both NF-PIN and TS-PIN methods, which predict essential proteins through active PPI networks constructed from dynamic gene expression.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that the new centrality measure, JDC, is more efficient than state-of-the-art prediction methods with same input. The main ideas behind JDC are as follows: (1) Essential proteins are generally densely connected clusters in the PPI network. (2) Binarizing gene expression data can screen out fluctuations in gene expression profiles. (3) The essentiality of the protein depends on the similarity of "active" and "inactive" state of gene expression in a cluster of the PPI network.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MapsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyProtein Interaction MappingROC CurveTranscriptomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsEdge clustering coefficientEssential proteinsJaccard similarity indexThe PPI networks

Identifiers

PMID33985429
PMCPMC8120700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.