ArticleOptics express2021
Two-step training deep learning framework for computational imaging without physics priors.
Article in Optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unsupervised adaptive coded illumination Fourier ptychographic microscopy based on a physical neural network.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Approximating the uncertainty of deep learning reconstruction predictions in single-pixel imaging.Communications engineering · 2023Article
- Deep learning for biomedical photoacoustic imaging: A review.Photoacoustics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) is a powerful tool in computational imaging for many applications. A common strategy is to use a preprocessor to reconstruct a preliminary image as the input to a neural network to achieve an optimized image. Usually, the preprocessor incorporates knowledge of the physics priors in the imaging model. One outstanding challenge, however, is errors that arise from imperfections in the assumed model. Model mismatches degrade the quality of the preliminary image and therefore affect the DL predictions. Another main challenge is that many imaging inverse problems are ill-posed and the networks are over-parameterized; DL networks have flexibility to extract features from the data that are not directly related to the imaging model. This can lead to suboptimal training and poorer image reconstruction results. To solve these challenges, a two-step training DL (TST-DL) framework is proposed for computational imaging without physics priors. First, a single fully-connected layer (FCL) is trained to directly learn the inverse model with the raw measurement data as the inputs and the images as the outputs. Then, this pre-trained FCL is fixed and concatenated with an un-trained deep convolutional network with a U-Net architecture for a second-step training to optimize the output image. This approach has the advantage that does not rely on an accurate representation of the imaging physics since the first-step training directly learns the inverse model. Furthermore, the TST-DL approach mitigates network over-parameterization by separately training the FCL and U-Net. We demonstrate this framework using a linear single-pixel camera imaging model. The results are quantitatively compared with those from other frameworks. The TST-DL approach is shown to perform comparable to approaches which incorporate perfect knowledge of the imaging model, to be robust to noise and model ill-posedness, and to be more robust to model mismatch than approaches which incorporate imperfect knowledge of the imaging model. Furthermore, TST-DL yields better results than end-to-end training while suffering from less overfitting. Overall, this TST-DL framework is a flexible approach for image reconstruction without physics priors, applicable to diverse computational imaging systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.