Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33985150›Full record

ArticleOptics express2021

Focusing light through multimode fibres using a digital micromirror device: a comparison study of non-holographic approaches.

Tianrui Zhao, Sebastien Ourselin, Tom Vercauteren, Wenfeng Xia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tianrui Zhao
Sebastien Ourselin
Tom Vercauteren
Wenfeng Xia
St Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 101957Wellcome Trust 203148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focusing light through a multimode fibre (MMF) has attracted significant research interest, mainly driven by the need for miniature endoscopes in biomedicine. In recent years, digital micromirror devices (DMD) have become increasingly popular as a high-speed alternative to liquid-crystal spatial light modulators for light focusing via wavefront shaping based on binary amplitude modulations. To exploit the potentials and limitations of the state-of-the-art DMD-based wavefront shaping methods, in this study, for the first time, we compared four representative, non-holographic and DMD-based methods that are reported so far in literature with the same experimental and simulation conditions, including a real-valued intensity transmission matrix (RVITM)-based algorithm, a complex-valued transmission matrix (TM)-based algorithm, a conditional probability algorithm and a genetic algorithm. We investigated the maximum achievable peak-to-background ratio (PBR) in comparison to theoretical expectations, and further improved the performance of the RVITM-based method. With both numerical simulations and experiments, we found that the genetic algorithm offered the highest PBR but suffered from the lowest focusing speed, while the RVITM-based algorithm provided a comparable PBR to that of the genetic algorithm, and the highest focusing speed.

Identifiers

PMID33985150
PMCPMC8240458
OpenAlexW3136576408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.