Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33984511›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2022

Epidemiological and clinical features of SARS-CoV-2 cluster infection in Anhui Province, Eastern China.

Jiabing Wu, Xiuzhi Chen, Lei Gong, Shaohu Huo, Xuehuan Gao, Shuang Nie, Fang Chen, Sai Hou, Dandan Song, Wanwan Ma and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jiabing WuAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China.
Xiuzhi ChenAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China.
Lei GongAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China.
Shaohu HuoDepartment of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xuehuan GaoAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China.
Shuang NieAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China.
Fang ChenAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China.
Sai HouAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China.
Dandan SongAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China.
Wanwan MaAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China.
Xuqin JiangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Zhirong LiuAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China. Electronic address: liuzhirong@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 has spread worldwide and become a pandemic. We report the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of cluster infections.

methodsData of clustered cases were retrieved from the public health emergency monitoring information system of China. We analyzed the incubation period, generation gap, secondary attack rate, and viral load in various grouped cases.

resultsA total of 60 COVID-19 infection clusters including 226 patients and 19 asymptomatic cases involving four generations were analyzed. With the increase of transmission generations, secondary attack rate decreased (P<0.001) and severity alleviated (P = 0.008). The median incubation period and intergenerational interval were 9 and 6 days, respectively. The secondary attack rate was 7.1% in the index cases, 5.0% in the first generation, 1.0% in the second generation, and 4.7% overall. Severe cases were seen more in the index (13, 65%) and first generation (7, 35%) ones, who had a significantly higher viral load than the mild and moderate ones.

conclusionsWith the increase of transmission generation, secondary infection rate and severity decreased. Severe patients had a higher virus load. Patients in the incubation period and asymptomatic carriers were potential infection sources who might play an important role in transmission.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2ChinaHumansIncidencePandemicsCluster infectionCoronavirus disease 19FeaturesIncubation periodSARS-CoV-2Transmission

Identifiers

PMID33984511
PMCPMC8110625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.