Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33984187›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2021

Green Chemistry Meets Asymmetric Organocatalysis: A Critical Overview on Catalysts Synthesis.

Achille Antenucci, Stefano Dughera, Polyssena Renzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. L-Cysteine-Catalysed Hydration of Activated Alkynes.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  7. RSC advances · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A robust heterogeneous chiral phosphoric acid enables multi decagram scale production of optically activeGreen chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. New small γ-turn typeRSC advances · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Achille AntenucciDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turin, Via Pietro Giuria, 7, 10125, Turin, Italy.
Stefano DugheraDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turin, Via Pietro Giuria, 7, 10125, Turin, Italy.
Polyssena RenziDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turin, Via Pietro Giuria, 7, 10125, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1326-8183

Funding

MIUR (Ministero Italiano dell'Università e della Ricerca)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can green chemistry be the right reading key to let organocatalyst design take a step forward towards sustainable catalysis? What if the intriguing chemistry promoted by more engineered organocatalysts was carried on by using renewable and naturally occurring molecular scaffolds, or at least synthetic catalysts more respectful towards the principles of green chemistry? Within the frame of these questions, this Review will tackle the most commonly occurring organic chiral catalysts from the perspective of their synthesis rather than their employment in chemical methodologies or processes. A classification of the catalyst scaffolds based on their E factor will be provided, and the global E factor (E

Indexed as

catalyst synthesisE factorgreen chemistryorganocatalysissustainability

Identifiers

PMID33984187
PMCPMC8362219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.