Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33984175›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2021

An integrated multicomponent care model for men affected by prostate cancer: A feasibility study of TrueNTH Australia.

Patsy Yates, Rob Carter, Robyn Cockerell, Donna Cowan, Cyril Dixon, Anne Magnus, Robert U Newton, Nicolas H Hart, Daniel A Galvão, Brenton Baguley and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07093177 (Multimodal Telerehabilitation of Rural Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07093177 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Multimodal Telerehabilitation of Rural Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2026 to 2028Enrolled30ConditionsProstate CancerArmsTelerehabilitation Unit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Prevalence of unmet supportive care needs reported by individuals ever diagnosed with cancer in Australia: a systematic review to support service prioritisation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Integrative oncology consultation and patient referral to complementary therapies: results from the prospective study THERAC.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Patsy YatesFaculty of Health, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Rob CarterFaculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robyn CockerellFaculty of Health, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Donna CowanMovember, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cyril DixonMovember, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anne MagnusFaculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robert U NewtonExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Nicolas H HartFaculty of Health, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2794-0193
Daniel A GalvãoExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8209-2281
Brenton BaguleySchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nicholas DennistonPrivate Practitioner, Queensland, Australia.
Tina SkinnerSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jeremy CouperDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jon EmeryDepartment of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mark FrydenbergDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Wei-Hong LiuFaculty of Health, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1241-517X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of implementing an integrated multicomponent survivorship care model for men affected by prostate cancer.

methodsUsing a single arm prospective cohort study design, men with prostate cancer were recruited from two regional public hospitals in Australia for a 6-months program that provided information and decision support, exercise and nutrition management, specialised clinical support, and practical support through localised and central care coordination. Carers of the men were also invited to the program. Data were collected from multiple sources to evaluate: (1) recruitment capability and participant characteristics; (2) appropriateness and feasibility of delivering the specific intervention components using an electronic care management tool; and (3) suitability of data collection procedures and proposed outcome measures.

resultsOf the 105 eligible men, 51 (consent rate 49%) participated in the program. Of the 31 carers nominated by the men, 13 consented (consent rate 42%). All carers and 50 (98%) men completed the program. Most (92%) men were newly diagnosed with localised prostate cancer. All men attended initial screening and assessment for supportive care needs; a total of 838 episodes of contact/consultation were made by the intervention team either in person (9%) or remotely (91%). The intervention was implemented as proposed with no adverse events. The proposed outcome measures and evaluation procedures were found to be appropriate.

conclusionsOur results support the feasibility of implementing this integrated multicomponent care model for men affected by prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsExerciseFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleProspective StudiesReferral and Consultationcancerfeasibilitymodel of careoncologyprostatepsycho-oncologyquality of lifesurvivorshipurology

Identifiers

PMID33984175
PMCPMC8518483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.