ReviewJournal of midwifery & women's health2021
Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction.
Review in Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Value of Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat Thickness for Dinoprostone-Induced Labor Success in Obese Pregnant Women: A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Construction of a nomogram model for predicting vaginal birth after induction of labor in pregnant women with fetal growth restriction at term.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Monocytes and cervical ripening: a narrative review of prolonged labor pathophysiology.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- [Cesarean section risk assessment for pregnant women at term].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025Observational
- High-Dose versus Low-Dose Oxytocin for Labor Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Prediction of Failure to Progress after Labor Induction: A Multivariable Model Using Pelvic Ultrasound and Clinical Data.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Factors Influencing Duration of Breastfeeding: Insights from a Prospective Study of Maternal Health Literacy and Obstetric Practices.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone for labor induction in multipara at term.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- The Correct Indication to Induce Labour in a Swiss Cantonal Hospital.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Induction of labor is increasingly a common component of the intrapartum care. Knowledge of the current evidence on methods of labor induction is an essential component of shared decision-making to determine which induction method meets an individual's health needs and personal preferences. This article provides a review of the current research evidence on labor induction methods, including cervical ripening techniques, and contraction stimulation techniques. Current evidence about expected duration of labor following induction, use of the Bishop score to guide induction, and guidance on the use of combination methods for labor induction are reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.