Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33984058›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Latent leprosy infection identified by dual RLEP and anti-PGL-I positivity: Implications for new control strategies.

Moises Batista da Silva, Wei Li, Raquel Carvalho Bouth, Angélica Rita Gobbo, Ana Caroline Cunha Messias, Tania Mara Pires Moraes, Erika Vanessa Oliveira Jorge, Josafá Gonçalves Barreto, Fred Bernardes Filho, Guilherme Augusto Barros Conde and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Molecular Detection ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. qPCR detection ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Many Hosts of Mycobacteria 9 (MHM9): A conference report.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. ELISA Test Based on the Phenolic Glycolipid-I (PGL-I) ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Modulation of the Response toFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Moises Batista da SilvaLaboratório de Dermato-Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3886-7083
Wei LiColorado State University, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Mycobacteria Research Laboratories, Fort Collins, CO, Unites States of America.
Raquel Carvalho BouthLaboratório de Dermato-Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Pará, Brazil.
Angélica Rita GobboLaboratório de Dermato-Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Pará, Brazil.
Ana Caroline Cunha MessiasLaboratório de Dermato-Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Pará, Brazil.
Tania Mara Pires MoraesInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Santarém, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0114-3735
Erika Vanessa Oliveira JorgeLaboratório de Dermato-Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Pará, Brazil.
Josafá Gonçalves BarretoLaboratório de Dermato-Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Pará, Brazil.
Fred Bernardes FilhoDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine of Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4690-1608
Guilherme Augusto Barros CondeLaboratório de Suporte a Decisões, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Santarém, Pará, Brazil.
Marco Andrey Cipriani FradeDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine of Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudio Guedes SalgadoLaboratório de Dermato-Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Pará, Brazil.
John Stewart SpencerColorado State University, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Mycobacteria Research Laboratories, Fort Collins, CO, Unites States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8051-3038
Universidade Federal do Pará · BRColorado State University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Oeste do Pará · BRInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Pará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of new cases of leprosy reported worldwide has remained essentially unchanged for the last decade despite continued global use of free multidrug therapy (MDT) provided to any diagnosed leprosy patient. In order to more effectively interrupt the chain of transmission, new strategies will be required to detect those with latent disease who contribute to furthering transmission. To improve the ability to diagnose leprosy earlier in asymptomatic infected individuals, we examined the combined use of two well-known biomarkers of M. leprae infection, namely the presence of M. leprae DNA by PCR from earlobe slit skin smears (SSS) and positive antibody titers to the M. leprae-specific antigen, Phenolic Glycolipid I (anti-PGL-I) from leprosy patients and household contacts living in seven hyperendemic cities in the northern state of Pará, Brazilian Amazon. Combining both tests increased sensitivity, specificity and accuracy over either test alone. A total of 466 individuals were evaluated, including 87 newly diagnosed leprosy patients, 52 post-treated patients, 296 household contacts and 31 healthy endemic controls. The highest frequency of double positives (PGL-I+/RLEP+) were detected in the new case group (40/87, 46%) with lower numbers for treated (12/52, 23.1%), household contacts (46/296, 15.5%) and healthy endemic controls (0/31, 0%). The frequencies in these groups were reversed for double negatives (PGL-I-/RLEP-) for new cases (6/87, 6.9%), treated leprosy cases (15/52, 28.8%) and the highest in household contacts (108/296, 36.5%) and healthy endemic controls (24/31, 77.4%). The data strongly suggest that household contacts that are double positive have latent disease, are likely contributing to shedding and transmission of disease to their close contacts and are at the highest risk of progressing to clinical disease. Proposed strategies to reduce leprosy transmission in highly endemic areas may include chemoprophylactic treatment of this group of individuals to stop the spread of bacilli to eventually lower new case detection rates in these areas.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialChildDNA, BacterialFemaleGlycolipidsHumansLatent InfectionLeprosyMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium lepraeAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialDNA, BacterialGlycolipidsphenolic glycolipid I, Mycobacterium leprae

Identifiers

PMID33984058
PMCPMC8118453
OpenAlexW3189055812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.