Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983964›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Isolation of intact extracellular vesicles from cryopreserved samples.

Shannon N Tessier, Lauren D Bookstaver, Cindy Angpraseuth, Cleo J Stannard, Beatriz Marques, Uyen K Ho, Alona Muzikansky, Berent Aldikacti, Eduardo Reátegui, Daniel C Rabe and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Extracellular Vesicles for Disease Treatment.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shannon N TessierDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2373-232X
Lauren D BookstaverDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Cindy AngpraseuthDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Cleo J StannardDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Beatriz MarquesDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Uyen K HoDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Alona MuzikanskyBiostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Berent AldikactiDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Eduardo ReáteguiDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Daniel C RabeDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6126-2280
Mehmet TonerDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Shannon L StottDepartment of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and BioMEMS Resource Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0349-0522

Funding

High subzero heart preservation: from zebrafish to mammalsR01HL157803 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Shannon Noella Tessier · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
Benchmarking the Sensitivity and Specificity of the Herringbone Microfluidic Device for Rare Particle CaptureR01CA226871 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NAHED, BRIAN VALA, STOTT, SHANNON L · 2018 to 2023
$2.3M
Whole heart suspended animation: leveraging the zebrafish to solve the organ shortageR00HL143149 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TESSIER, SHANNON NOELLA · 2021 to 2023
$747k
Whole heart suspended animation: leveraging the zebrafish to solve the organ shortageK99HL143149 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TESSIER, SHANNON NOELLA · 2019 to 2020
$215k
The role of extracellular vesicles in regulating response to immunotherapyF32CA236417 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RABE, DANIEL CHRISTOPHER · 2020 to 2022
$209k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA236417NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226871NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL143149NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL143149NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as promising candidates in biomarker discovery and diagnostics. Protected by the lipid bilayer, the molecular content of EVs in diverse biofluids are protected from RNases and proteases in the surrounding environment that may rapidly degrade targets of interests. Nonetheless, cryopreservation of EV-containing samples to -80°C may expose the lipid bilayer to physical and biological stressors which may result in cryoinjury and contribute to changes in EV yield, function, or molecular cargo. In the present work, we systematically evaluate the effect of cryopreservation at -80°C for a relatively short duration of storage (up to 12 days) on plasma- and media-derived EV particle count and/or RNA yield/quality, as compared to paired fresh controls. On average, we found that the plasma-derived EV concentration of stored samples decreased to 23% of fresh samples. Further, this significant decrease in EV particle count was matched with a corresponding significant decrease in RNA yield whereby plasma-derived stored samples contained only 47-52% of the total RNA from fresh samples, depending on the extraction method used. Similarly, media-derived EVs showed a statistically significant decrease in RNA yield whereby stored samples were 58% of the total RNA from fresh samples. In contrast, we did not obtain clear evidence of decreased RNA quality through analysis of RNA traces. These results suggest that samples stored for up to 12 days can indeed produce high-quality RNA; however, we note that when directly comparing fresh versus cryopreserved samples without cryoprotective agents there are significant losses in total RNA. Finally, we demonstrate that the addition of the commonly used cryoprotectant agent, DMSO, alongside greater control of the rate of cooling/warming, can rescue EVs from damaging ice formation and improve RNA yield.

Indexed as

CryopreservationCulture MediaExtracellular VesiclesHealthy VolunteersHumansPlasmaRNARNA StabilitySpecimen HandlingCulture MediaRNA

Identifiers

PMID33983964
PMCPMC8118530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.