Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983941›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Who infects whom?-Reconstructing infection chains of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in an endemically infected dairy herd by use of genomic data.

Annette Nigsch, Suelee Robbe-Austerman, Tod P Stuber, Paulina D Pavinski Bitar, Yrjö T Gröhn, Ynte H Schukken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Age-structured next generation matrix and RInfectious Disease Modelling · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Progress in Paratuberculosis Control Programmes for Dairy Herds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. High clonality ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  5. Molecular Diversity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantitative Risk Assessment of Exposure toFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Metabolites · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Annette NigschDepartment of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6864-7447
Suelee Robbe-AustermanUSDA APHIS National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3794-3040
Tod P StuberUSDA APHIS National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Paulina D Pavinski BitarDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
Yrjö T GröhnDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
Ynte H SchukkenDepartment of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USCornell University · USRoyal GD (Netherlands) · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence of circulation of multiple strains within herds and mixed infections of cows marks the beginning of a rethink of our knowledge on Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) epidemiology. Strain typing opens new ways to investigate MAP transmission. This work presents a method for reconstructing infection chains in a setting of endemic Johne's disease on a well-managed dairy farm. By linking genomic data with demographic field data, strain-specific differences in spreading patterns could be quantified for a densely sampled dairy herd. Mixed infections of dairy cows with MAP are common, and some strains spread more successfully. Infected cows remain susceptible for co-infections with other MAP genotypes. The model suggested that cows acquired infection from 1-4 other cows and spread infection to 0-17 individuals. Reconstructed infection chains supported the hypothesis that high shedding animals that started to shed at an early age and showed a progressive infection pattern represented a greater risk for spreading MAP. Transmission of more than one genotype between animals was recorded. In this farm with a good MAP control management program, adult-to-adult contact was proposed as the most important transmission route to explain the reconstructed networks. For each isolate, at least one more likely ancestor could be inferred. Our study results help to capture underlying transmission processes and to understand the challenges of tracing MAP spread within a herd. Only the combination of precise longitudinal field data and bacterial strain type information made it possible to trace infection in such detail.

Indexed as

DairyingGenomicsAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesChain of InfectionEndemic DiseasesFemaleLikelihood FunctionsMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisParatuberculosisPhenotypePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID33983941
PMCPMC8118464
OpenAlexW3161968600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.