ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speciation of European bullheads (Cottus spp.): The next problem for taxonomy of northern freshwater fishes.Journal of fish biology · 2026Review
- Coats of Variable Hue in Tunisian Hares (GenusAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Latitudinal Clines in Gene Flow and Demographic Stability Reveal Drivers of Microendemism in a Radiation of Alpine Grasshoppers.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- A Phylogenetic Approach to Delimitate Species in a Probabilistic Way.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- From chaos to tranquillity: a modern approach to the identification, nomenclature and phylogeny ofStudies in mycology · 2025Article
- Peripheral Budding Following Range Expansion Explains Diversity and Distribution of One-Sided Livebearing Fish.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Species Limits and Hybridization in Andean Leaf-Eared Mice (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Species Delimitation Using Genomic Data: Options and Limitations.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Exon Capture Museomics Deciphers the Nine-Banded Armadillo Species Complex and Identifies a New Species Endemic to the Guiana Shield.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- A clear distinction and presence of Acropora aff. divaricata within Acropora cf. solitaryensis species complex along their biogeographic distribution in East Asia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Integrative taxonomy clarifies the evolution of a cryptic primate clade.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Piikun: an information theoretic toolkit for analysis and visualization of species delimitation metric space.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Understanding species limits through the formation of phylogeographic lineages.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Establishing species boundaries in Bornean geckos.Biology letters · 2024Article
- ExploringPeerJ · 2024Article
- Acknowledging more biodiversity without more species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Global phylogenomic assessment of Leptoseris and Agaricia reveals substantial undescribed diversity at mesophotic depths.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Geometric Morphometric Versus Genomic Patterns in a Large Polyploid Plant Species Complex.Biology · 2023Article
- A global phylogenomic analysis of the shiitake genusProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial resolution of data increases, a proliferation of artifactual species results as within-species population lineages, detected due to restrictions in gene flow, are identified as distinct species. The toll of this extends beyond systematic studies, getting magnified across the many disciplines that rely upon an accurate framework of identified species. Here we present the first of a new class of approaches that addresses this issue by incorporating an extended speciation process for species delimitation. We model the formation of population lineages and their subsequent development into independent species as separate processes and provide for a way to incorporate current understanding of the species boundaries in the system through specification of species identities of a subset of population lineages. As a result, species boundaries and within-species lineages boundaries can be discriminated across the entire system, and species identities can be assigned to the remaining lineages of unknown affinities with quantified probabilities. In addition to the identification of species units in nature, the primary goal of species delimitation, the incorporation of a speciation model also allows us insights into the links between population and species-level processes. By explicitly accounting for restrictions in gene flow not only between, but also within, species, we also address the limits of genetic data for delimiting species. Specifically, while genetic data alone is not sufficient for accurate delimitation, when considered in conjunction with other information we are able to not only learn about species boundaries, but also about the tempo of the speciation process itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.