Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983832›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2021

Mechanisms and Models in Heart Failure: A Translational Approach.

Douglas L Mann, G Michael Felker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Gene Therapy for Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Endosomal Mechanisms in Heart Failure Pathophysiology.Current heart failure reports · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Impact of exercise on the 21Sports medicine and health science · 2025
    Review
  13. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Harnessing the lymphatic system.Heart failure reviews · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas L MannCenter for Cardiovascular Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (D.L.M.).
G Michael FelkerDuke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, Duke University, NC (G.M.F.).
Duke University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

ROLE OF AUTOPHAGIC FLUX IN CARDIAC MYOCYTE VIABILITYR01HL107594 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Abhinav Diwan · 2011 to 2026
$5.9M
SALsalate to Improve Exercise toleraNce and LVDD in T2dm-DHF (SALIENT-DHF trial)U10HL110309 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVILA-ROMAN, VICTOR G., MANN, DOUGLAS L · 2012 to 2018
$3.5M
Plasmonically Enhanced Point-of-care Detection of Cardiac Biomarkers by a Smart PhoneR01HL144928 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MIKKELSEN, MAIKEN · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
The Feasibility of a Biomarker Guided Strategy in Anthracycline CardiotoxicityR21HL152148 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KY, BONNIE · 2020 to 2021
$461k
Autophagy in Myocardial Recovery and RemissionI01BX005065 · VA · ST. LOUIS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DIWAN, ABHINAV · 2020 to 2023
–
BLRD VA I01 BX005065NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL107594NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144928NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL152148NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite multiple attempts to develop a unifying hypothesis that explains the pathophysiology of heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), no single conceptual model has withstood the test of time. In the present review, we discuss how the results of recent successful phase III clinical development programs in HFrEF are built upon existing conceptual models for drug development. We will also discuss where recent successes in clinical trials do not fit existing models to identify areas where further refinement of current paradigms may be needed. To provide the necessary structure for this review, we will begin with a brief overview of the pathophysiology of HFrEF, followed by an overview of the current conceptual models for HFrEF, and end with an analysis of the scientific rationale and clinical development programs for 4 new therapeutic classes of drugs that have improved clinical outcomes in HFrEF. The 4 new therapeutic classes discussed are ARNIs, SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitors, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, and myosin activators. With the exception of SGLT2 inhibitors, each of these therapeutic advances was informed by the insights provided by existing conceptual models of heart failure. Although the quest to determine the mechanism of action of SGLT2 inhibitors is ongoing, this therapeutic class of drugs may represent the most important advance in cardiovascular therapeutics of recent decades and may lead to rethinking or expanding our current conceptual models for HFrEF.

Indexed as

Stroke VolumeAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDrug CombinationsDrug DevelopmentEnzyme ActivatorsHeart FailureHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHumansModels, BiologicalNatriuretic PeptidesNeprilysinPyrimidinesSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsEnzyme ActivatorsHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingNatriuretic PeptidesNeprilysinomecamtiv mecarbilPyrimidinessacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsSoluble Guanylyl CyclaseUreaValsartanvericiguatangiotensinclinical trialdrug therapyheart failureneprilysinsoluble guanylate cyclase

Identifiers

PMID33983832
PMCPMC8130816
OpenAlexW3163661623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.