Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983641›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2021

Simulating longitudinal data from marginal structural models using the additive hazard model.

Ruth H Keogh, Shaun R Seaman, Jon Michael Gran, Stijn Vansteelandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Marginal structural models for multilevel clustered data.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Simulating Data From Marginal Structural Models for a Survival Time Outcome.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2024
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruth H KeoghDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6504-3253
Shaun R SeamanMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3726-5937
Jon Michael GranOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Stijn VansteelandtDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4207-8733

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/10Medical Research Council MR/S017968/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational longitudinal data on treatments and covariates are increasingly used to investigate treatment effects, but are often subject to time-dependent confounding. Marginal structural models (MSMs), estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting or the g-formula, are popular for handling this problem. With increasing development of advanced causal inference methods, it is important to be able to assess their performance in different scenarios to guide their application. Simulation studies are a key tool for this, but their use to evaluate causal inference methods has been limited. This paper focuses on the use of simulations for evaluations involving MSMs in studies with a time-to-event outcome. In a simulation, it is important to be able to generate the data in such a way that the correct forms of any models to be fitted to those data are known. However, this is not straightforward in the longitudinal setting because it is natural for data to be generated in a sequential conditional manner, whereas MSMs involve fitting marginal rather than conditional hazard models. We provide general results that enable the form of the correctly specified MSM to be derived based on a conditional data generating procedure, and show how the results can be applied when the conditional hazard model is an Aalen additive hazard or Cox model. Using conditional additive hazard models is advantageous because they imply additive MSMs that can be fitted using standard software. We describe and illustrate a simulation algorithm. Our results will help researchers to effectively evaluate causal inference methods via simulation.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalComputer SimulationModels, StructuralProportional Hazards Modelsadditive hazard modelcausal inferencecongenial modelslongitudinal datamarginal structural modelsimulation studysurvival analysistime-dependent confounding

Identifiers

PMID33983641
PMCPMC7612178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.