Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983630›Full record

ArticleCancer2021

Maximizing cancer prevention through genetic navigation for Lynch syndrome detection in women with newly diagnosed endometrial and nonserous/nonmucinous epithelial ovarian cancer.

Soyoun Rachel Kim, Alicia Tone, Raymond H Kim, Matthew Cesari, Blaise A Clarke, Lua Eiriksson, Tae L Hart, Melyssa Aronson, Spring Holter, Alice Lytwyn and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Soyoun Rachel KimDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5694-5439
Alicia ToneDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Raymond H KimFred A. Litwin Family Centre for Genetic Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew CesariDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Blaise A ClarkeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lua EirikssonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Tae L HartZane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5209-4059
Melyssa AronsonZane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Spring HolterZane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alice LytwynDivision of Anatomical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Manjula MagantiDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leslie OldfieldDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Steven GallingerDivision of General Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marcus Q BernardiniDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amit M OzaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bojana DjordjevicDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jordan Lerner-EllisDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3685-5679
Emily Van de LaarDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle VicusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Trevor J PughDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aaron PollettDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah E FergusonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2123-3642

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society 704038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite recommendations for reflex immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins to identify Lynch syndrome (LS), the uptake of genetic assessment by those who meet referral criteria is low. The authors implemented a comprehensive genetic navigation program to increase the uptake of genetic testing for LS in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) or nonserous/nonmucinous ovarian cancer (OC).

methodsParticipants with newly diagnosed EC or OC were prospectively recruited from 3 cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. Family history questionnaires were used to assess LS-specific family history. Reflex IHC for MMR proteins was performed with the inclusion of clinical directives in pathology reports. A trained genetic navigator initiated a genetic referral on behalf of the treating physician and facilitated genetic referrals to the closest genetics center.

resultsA total of 841 participants (642 with EC, 172 with OC, and 27 with synchronous EC/OC) consented to the study; 194 (23%) were MMR-deficient by IHC. Overall, 170 women (20%) were eligible for a genetic assessment for LS: 35 on the basis of their family history alone, 24 on the basis of their family history and IHC, 82 on the basis of IHC alone, and 29 on the basis of clinical discretion. After adjustments for participants who died (n = 6), 149 of 164 patients (91%) completed a genetic assessment, and 111 were offered and completed genetic testing. Thirty-four women (4.0% of the total cohort and 30.6% of those with genetic testing) were diagnosed with LS: 5 with mutL homolog 1 (MLH1), 9 with mutS homolog 2 (MSH2), 15 with mutS homolog 6 (MSH6), and 5 with PMS2.

conclusionsThe introduction of a navigated genetic program resulted in a high rate of genetic assessment (>90%) in patients with gynecologic cancer at risk for LS.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisEndometrial NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinOntarioDNA-Binding ProteinsG-T mismatch-binding proteinMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinPMS2 protein, humangenetic navigatorgenetic uptakeLynch syndrome

Identifiers

PMID33983630
PMCPMC8453540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.