Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983559›Full record

ArticleAmbio2022

Freshwater systems and ecosystem services: Challenges and chances for cross-fertilization of disciplines.

Ágnes Vári, Simone A Podschun, Tibor Erős, Thomas Hein, Beáta Pataki, Ioan-Cristian Iojă, Cristian Mihai Adamescu, Almut Gerhardt, Tamás Gruber, Anita Dedić and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Riverine Microplastic Pollution: Insights from Cagayan de Oro River, Philippines.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Ágnes VáriLendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Centre for Ecological Research, 2-4 Alkotmány utca, 2163, Vácrátót, Hungary. vari.agnes@ecolres.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5285-847X
Simone A PodschunDepartment Ecohydrology, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Justus-von-Liebig-Str. 7, 12489, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-6653
Tibor ErősELKH Balaton Limnological Research Institute, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, 8237, Tihany, Hungary.
Thomas HeinInstitute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7767-4607
Beáta PatakiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Ótemető u. 2-4, 4028, Debrecen, Hungary.
Ioan-Cristian IojăCenter for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest, Bulevardul Nicolae Bălcescu nr. 1, Bucureşti, 030167, Romania.
Cristian Mihai AdamescuResearch Center for Systems Ecology and Sustainability, University of Bucharest, 050095, Bucharest, Romania.
Almut GerhardtLimco International GmbH, Wollmatinger Str. 22, 78467, Constance, Germany.
Tamás GruberWWF Hungary, Álmos vezér útja 69/A, 1141, Budapest, Hungary.
Anita DedićBiology Department, Faculty of Science and Education, University of Mostar, Rodoč bb, 88 000, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Miloš ĆirićInstitute of Chemistry, Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Njegoševa 12, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Bojan GavrilovićDepartment of Physical Geography, Geographical Institute "Jovan Cvijić", Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Djure Jakšića 9, Belgrade, Serbia.
András BáldiLendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Centre for Ecological Research, 2-4 Alkotmány utca, 2163, Vácrátót, Hungary.
HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research · HUUniversity of Bucharest · ROHUN-REN Balaton Limnological Research Institute · HULeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries · DESerbian Academy of Sciences and Arts · RSUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Debrecen · HUUniversity of Mostar · BAWasser Cluster Lunz · ATWWF Hungary

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystems are among the most threatened in the world, while providing numerous essential ecosystem services (ES) to humans. Despite their importance, research on freshwater ecosystem services is limited. Here, we examine how freshwater studies could help to advance ES research and vice versa. We summarize major knowledge gaps and suggest solutions focusing on science and policy in Europe. We found several features that are unique to freshwater ecosystems, but often disregarded in ES assessments. Insufficient transfer of knowledge towards stakeholders is also problematic. Knowledge transfer and implementation seems to be less effective towards South-east Europe. Focusing on the strengths of freshwater research regarding connectivity, across borders, involving multiple actors can help to improve ES research towards a more dynamic, landscape-level approach, which we believe can boost the implementation of the ES concept in freshwater policies. Bridging these gaps can contribute to achieve the ambitious targets of the EU's Green Deal.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEuropeFertilizationFresh WaterHumansAquatic ecosystemsBlue infrastructureEcosystem functionsEU Water Framework DirectiveInland waters

Identifiers

PMID33983559
PMCPMC8651970
OpenAlexW3162437832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.